DEVELOPING: Here We Go Again: Another ICE-Involved Shooting, This Time in Austin (VIDEO)
Bloodsucker Proxy: Communist Asks for a DSA Mascot, Gets a Whole Lot More
Ron DeSantis Shares Headline That Sums Up Healthcare in 2026
Sen. Chuck Grassley Argues for a Diesel Embargo
Ed Sheeran Should Have Listened to Dana Loesch — NEVER Bend the Knee...
Jonathan Karl Remembers the First Amendment
Take the L, Barack: You Pulled the SAME 'Ban the Media' Stunt You're...
Dana Bash Tries Shaming Mike Walz for Defending Trump's CNN Ban and WOW,...
HOOBOY: Amy Klobuchar Caught Using the Same Pic Trying to Connect With Normies...
Look Out Elizabeth Warren, Peggy Flanagan Is Coming for YOUR Grift (and She's...
Troy Jackson Dodging This Particular Question Is Just DAMNING on So Many Levels...
TWOCH Full VOD Episode 09192026
WATCH: Student BIZARRELY Flips Out After Black Pro-Lifer Hits Back on Her ‘Kirk...
Guess Who Came to Dinner? Abdul El-Sayed's 'Lesbian Rosh Hashanah' Stunt BACKFIRES Spectac...
The Hack Is Back: Podcaster Jim Acosta Abandons Pool Duty to Encourage ‘Journo’...

NYT photographer debunks AOC's dopey Hope Hicks 'glamour shot' narrative

As we told you over the weekend, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (and others!) were quite miffed at the New York Times for running this “glamour shot” of Hope Hicks along with an article on whether or not she will comply with a House subpoena:

Advertisement

Here’s the photo from the NYT’s Tom Brenner that set her off:

Now for the real story. That photo is not a “glamour shot” at all and was just a normal photo of Hicks at work:

Brenner didn’t even know Hicks would be in the room before he took the photo:

Advertisement

And we’ll note that maybe AOC is not the best one to be complaining about using glamour shots to humanize someone in politics. Remember this?

***

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement