Imagine writing this and then hitting tweet:
Imagine saying the only way to stop shark attacks is with more sharks.
— David Hogg (@davidhogg111) November 14, 2018
First up, we’d love to have a shark for self-defense while swimming in the ocean:
If I had my own personal sharks trained to fight off sharks attacking me that would be AWESOME. Preferably with lasers. https://t.co/kyooIK4w8L
— Mo Mo (@molratty) November 14, 2018
But we’re not entirely sure what he’s getting at:
#HoggLogic can be confusing at times.
So, you want to get rid of all the sharks? https://t.co/VjuamDO0Qu
— ForAmerica (@ForAmerica) November 14, 2018
Because sharks and guns are not alike. AT. ALL:
Sharks, of course, are wild animals that have minds of their own, unlike inanimate objects. https://t.co/QgxFGHGWem
— Ashley Rae Goldenberg (@Communism_Kills) November 14, 2018
So we should ban sharks?
Ban sharks! https://t.co/gdKjkQVQlP
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) November 14, 2018
Because then only “criminals will have sharks,” and that sounds terrifying:
If sharks are banned, only criminals will have sharks https://t.co/YpoKUWPYHW
— Shoshana Weissmann, Regulatory Reform Muse (@senatorshoshana) November 14, 2018
It’s confusing to say the least:
Imagine saying the only way to stop shark attacks is to ban carp. https://t.co/RVyH5gPJW9
— Ben (@BenHowe) November 14, 2018
Try again, David:
Imagine thinking you made a point here. https://t.co/CuU26fC7W9
— RBe (@RBPundit) November 14, 2018
This must have sounded really smart in your head. https://t.co/nK5HDHQpsS
— Duchess of Bourbon AnnaD (@AnnaDsays) November 14, 2018
Imagine saying the only way to stop bad analogies is with more analogies… https://t.co/G8pvwHtS9d
— Rick Ingraham (@RickIngraham) November 14, 2018
***
Join the conversation as a VIP Member