Matt Gaetz Shares a Nugget of Information About His Future and it Raises...
Chris Murphy Warns Pam Bondi Would Turn DOJ Into a Political Arm of...
Oops, She Did it Again ... 'LOL-yer' Sunny Hostin Forced to Read ANOTHER...
You Don't Despise the Media Enough! MSNBC Edits AWFUL Laken Riley Trial Headline...
Jailed, Hospitalized, Elected Representative-Elect Shelley Luther of Texas
No Balls In Our Stalls: Nancy Mace Will Not Back Down
Joe Biden is Still the President and His Latest Gaffe Proves All of...
MORE 'Paid Propaganda': AP's Recent Cuts Clearly Didn't Hit Their Climate Change Alarmism...
Creepy Used Car Salesman: Gavin Newsom Gets DRAGGED for Speech Saying 'I Care...
Historian on MSNBC Says Pete Hegseth Promoted Military-Level Weaponry by Selling Grenade-S...
Here's Another Accidentally GREAT Endorsement of Kash Patel for an FBI Leadership Role
Pathologist Shocks Daniel Penny Trial by Pointing to Another Cause of Death for...
She's Gone Full Fruit Loop: Whoopi Dons Tin Foil Hat, Claims Elon Is...
'OH, NO! SHE'S COMPETENT!' MSNBC Accidentally Endorses AG Pick Pam Bondi During Meltdown
Draggin' Over Dragons: Joe Rogan Shields Himself Against Joy Behar's Fiery Flames

Don't look now, but the Roger Stone story just got worse for the DOJ. A whole LOT WORSE!

Oh, man. . .

The Roger Stone story just got a whole lot more BONKERS:

Advertisement

Apparently, the foreperson of the jury that convicted Roger Stone wrote an op-ed for CNN which then led to people finding her social media activity, and BAM:

More from Mike Cernovich:

Here’s the CNN article where she outed herself:

She also ran for Congress in 2012:

Advertisement

So, how the eff did this get missed by Stone’s lawyers? Did she lie on her jury questionnaire?

She was also tweeting during the case:

It’s going to get messay AF:

It looks like Stone has already asked for a retrial, but has been denied:

Advertisement

More from the Examiner:

According to the judge’s ruling, unsealed on Wednesday afternoon, Stone’s argument that a new trial was warranted hinged on two main claims about why the juror, whose identity was concealed in the filing, should have been removed. The first was because the juror is employed at a division of the Internal Revenue Service, which Stone claimed “works hand-in-hand with the Department of Justice prosecuting criminal tax matters.” The second was because Stone claimed the juror “violated the court’s order to avoid media coverage of the case.”

The judge rejected both of these claims, arguing that Stone’s defense team “has not presented grounds for a new trial” under the appropriate rules nor shown “any reason to believe there has been a serious miscarriage of justice.”

To be continued. . .

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement