Every Dollar at Biden WH's Disposal Being 'Pushed Out the Door' to Ukraine...
All the REEEE! LOL! WATCH Eric Swalwell 'S**TTING BRICKS' Over a Possible AG...
Hilarious, KICK-BUTT Thread CELEBRATES The Guardian Bailing on X By Sharing Their BEST...
Lawyer UP! Elon Musk DROPS the Hammer on Adam Schiff for Shrieking over...
This Explains a LOT! Here's Why Kamala Didn't Go on Joe Rogan (According...
The ANTI-Soros: With a Single Hand Gesture at Mar-a-Lago, Elon Musk Tells George...
Can You Count, Jimmy? Election Denier Jim Acosta Claims Trump Didn't Win the...
The 'Joy' Is Gone! Joy Reid Deletes Her Account on X as MSNBC's...
Shocker: Keith Boykin Makes Pete Hegseth's Nomination All About Race
Heigh-Ho! Snow White Actress Wishes Trump and his Supporters Would Bite into a...
Illinois Governor Says Law Enforcement Will Not Cooperate With Deportations
Don Lemon Joins The Twitter Quitter Train
Why Can't We Be Friends? AI Music Video Provides Hilarious Glimpse of Trump...
Elon Musk Asks If Taxpayer Dollars Should Go to NPR's CEO, Who Calls...
Birth Control: The Left's Latest Boogeyman

Don't look now, but the Roger Stone story just got worse for the DOJ. A whole LOT WORSE!

Oh, man. . .

The Roger Stone story just got a whole lot more BONKERS:

Advertisement

Apparently, the foreperson of the jury that convicted Roger Stone wrote an op-ed for CNN which then led to people finding her social media activity, and BAM:

More from Mike Cernovich:

Here’s the CNN article where she outed herself:

She also ran for Congress in 2012:

Advertisement

So, how the eff did this get missed by Stone’s lawyers? Did she lie on her jury questionnaire?

She was also tweeting during the case:

It’s going to get messay AF:

It looks like Stone has already asked for a retrial, but has been denied:

Advertisement

More from the Examiner:

According to the judge’s ruling, unsealed on Wednesday afternoon, Stone’s argument that a new trial was warranted hinged on two main claims about why the juror, whose identity was concealed in the filing, should have been removed. The first was because the juror is employed at a division of the Internal Revenue Service, which Stone claimed “works hand-in-hand with the Department of Justice prosecuting criminal tax matters.” The second was because Stone claimed the juror “violated the court’s order to avoid media coverage of the case.”

The judge rejected both of these claims, arguing that Stone’s defense team “has not presented grounds for a new trial” under the appropriate rules nor shown “any reason to believe there has been a serious miscarriage of justice.”

To be continued. . .

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement