People Sound Off on AOC's Condemnation of Police Enforcing the Law Against Protesters
Here's What Inspired the Most Catholic President Ever™ Joe Biden to Make the...
Joe Biden Posts a Video of President Donald Trump NOT Saying to Inject...
WATCH the Video That the House the Sergeant at Arms Wants to Fine...
Columbia Going to Remote Learning for the Remainder of the Semester
Biden Tells Huge Crowd of Supporters in Tampa That Florida Is in Play...
What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong? Ohio-Based Company Introduces Flamethrower Robot Dog
On Truth Social, Trump Assures His Second Term Will Be ‘Vitriolic’ and ‘Vengeful’
Leftist Loser Who Harassed Alec Baldwin LIES About Interaction, Gets Community Note Treatm...
Anti-Trump Media Lawyers Hold Weekly Zoom Call to Discuss Trial
WATCH: Dollar General Employee Could Not Care Less As Customer Harrasses Him for...
WaPo Notes the Uptick of ‘Antiwar’ Protests on Campus
LOL! Watch Election Denier Stacey Abrams Say Attacking DEI Is Attacking Democracy
Trump Prosecutor Used to Be the No. 3 Official at Biden’s DOJ
WATCH: NASA Administrator Bill Nelson Shows He Needs Remedial Astronomy Classes

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement