RIP Your Mentions: Matt Gertz of MMFA Realizes He's in for a Wild...
Sen. John Fetterman Calls Trump’s Nominations ‘God-Tier-Level Trolling
Smells Like RETRIBUTION to Us! After Polymarket Predicted Trump Win, FBI Raids Home...
Bucks County Democratic Officials Decide to Count Illegal Ballots and Admit They Don't...
Don't Let the Door Hit Ya! Eva Longoria Has Moved Family Out of...
AP, Decision Desk HQ Call PA Senate Race, but Dems Are Still Trying...
Florida AG Ashely Moody Is Going to Make Sure FEMA Answers for Discriminating...
CNN Panel Left Speechless After Scott Jennings Defends 'American Hero' Pete Hegseth
Make Enforcing Laws Great Again! Seattle (Yes, SEATTLE) Starts Jailing Shoplifters, Other...
Dem Rep. Dan Goldman Took the Bait After Trump Joked About Running Again...
Yes. I'm Embarrassed That YOU'RE an American, Frothy-Mouthed Leftist. Does That COUNT?
Nature Is Healing: X Users Notice AOC Has Removed Pronouns From Her Bio
JD Vance Has Our Betters Clutching All SORTS of Pearls With BRUTAL Merrick...
Trump Wages War on the Deep State! Sends Shockwave Through DC!
HEROES: Female Athletes File First Amendment, Title IX Suit Against Conference Over Trans...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement