And Here We GOOO: Insider Says Dan Bongino Took Day off After Clashing...
Oh NO! Not SOCCER! Canadian Learns the HARD Way Americans Don't GAF What...
Harry Sisson's Prediction for a Hypothetical Vance vs. Newsom Race Might Thrill JD...
They're SOOOOO Easy: White House's Latest Troll of Our Pals on the Left...
Sen. Cory Booker's Complaint About Criminal Investigations of Comey and Brennan Sure Sound...
Wanna See John Fugelsang Cry? Check Out Scott Jennings' Post Mocking Him for...
Megyn Kelly Tears Chelsea Clinton a NEW ONE in Savage Back-and-Forth Over Her...
Salena Zito Gives an Inside Look at Her New Book 'Butler'
Bill Melugin Torpedoes Dem Rep's Dishonest Post About ICE Raid at Calif. 'Strawberry'...
POPCORN! Libs of TikTok Completely BROKE Gavin Newsom Last Night and We All...
Don't Burst Our Bubble! The NYT and Joyce Carol Oates Are Terrified of...
Shots Fired at Federal Agents as ICE Raids a Weed Farm in California
DNC Chair Ken Martin Says the Dem Party Tent is Big Enough to...
Lunatic Fringe Benefits? Victor Davis Hanson Asks If Zohran Mamdani’s Cons are Actually...
ICE Agents Under Gunfire as Democrats Continue to Demonize Them for Enforcing Immigration...

‘Rogue’ SCOTUS falls out of line with progressive social agenda, ruling according to ... the law. Is that even legal?!?

Progressive panic wages on as the Left struggles to comprehend that SCOTUS has managed to slow the roll of their aggressive social agenda. Using carefully appointed Federal judges to form policy from the bench is very effective until it isn’t. When SCOTUS suddenly refuses to do your bidding or begins to review and overturn rulings of the past, you may start to feel out of control.

Advertisement

Wait a minute. Are decisions that a self-proclaimed progressive law professor disagrees with a clear indication or “rogue” activity? Different interpretations of existing law and returning power to the states do not qualify as lawlessness according to anything in our Constitution, um, professor.

It’s hard to accept the new crew isn’t willing to rule by anything other than existing law. It’s almost like they’re not even partisan. Oh wait, that was the founding intention for the judiciaries.

Advertisement

This isn’t about sides. This is about the law and the procedure for updating existing law by working through the legislators – elected officials who act according to the will of the people. Somebody teach the teacher.

Not liking the law isn’t justification for abandoning it… unless you’re an ‘outragey’ progressive.

Save the fight for the ballot box and take a legal lesson, guys.

Advertisement

At least irrational responses provide a platform for communicating Constitutional intent educating the masses.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos