‘I Like My Suitcase!’: Viral Barron Trump Dance Club Track and Paris Hilton,...
Convicted Murderer Complains He Had a White Jury, and That's Not Law, It's...
President Trump Has Been President for Over a Month and Hasn't Done One...
Weaponization Committee Issues Report on the 'Censorship-Industrial Complex'
Report: Boy Rubs Himself With Lotion in Girls' Locker Room to 'Prevent Chafing'
GENDER BIAS: End Wokeness Points Out Misleading Graphic on Homelessness
Wajahat Ali Wants to ‘F Elon Musk and His Ghouls to the Lowest...
Despicable: Joe Biden Kept Families of Fallen Marines Waiting Hours While He Napped...
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Still Working on Racially Integrating His Beach Club
It's Not About the Climate: Activists Throw Paint on a Tesla to Stick...
Senators Release Report on 20-Month Investigation Into SCOTUS 'Ethics Crisis'
EL. OH. EL! Donna Brazile Pens Slobbering Op-Ed Calling Joe Biden One of...
Proposed Note: German Christmas Market Terrorist Was Islamophobic Right-Winger
So Much for 'Non-Violent', Huh? Biden Grants Clemency to 'Black Widow' Who Offed...
Tom Homan Explains Why DHS Secretary Mayorkas' Claim of Thorough Vetting of Illegals...

‘Rogue’ SCOTUS falls out of line with progressive social agenda, ruling according to ... the law. Is that even legal?!?

Progressive panic wages on as the Left struggles to comprehend that SCOTUS has managed to slow the roll of their aggressive social agenda. Using carefully appointed Federal judges to form policy from the bench is very effective until it isn’t. When SCOTUS suddenly refuses to do your bidding or begins to review and overturn rulings of the past, you may start to feel out of control.

Advertisement

Wait a minute. Are decisions that a self-proclaimed progressive law professor disagrees with a clear indication or “rogue” activity? Different interpretations of existing law and returning power to the states do not qualify as lawlessness according to anything in our Constitution, um, professor.

It’s hard to accept the new crew isn’t willing to rule by anything other than existing law. It’s almost like they’re not even partisan. Oh wait, that was the founding intention for the judiciaries.

Advertisement

This isn’t about sides. This is about the law and the procedure for updating existing law by working through the legislators – elected officials who act according to the will of the people. Somebody teach the teacher.

Not liking the law isn’t justification for abandoning it… unless you’re an ‘outragey’ progressive.

Save the fight for the ballot box and take a legal lesson, guys.

Advertisement

At least irrational responses provide a platform for communicating Constitutional intent educating the masses.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement