What Now? House Votes to Hold Merrick Garland in Contempt for Refusing to...
Media Bias on Full Display After Hunter's Conviction
Guess How Much Terror Watchlist Encounters Shot Up After Biden Said 'Surge to...
This Liberal Woman Was NOT Happy a Man Dared to Question Her Abortion...
'You Liars'! Miranda Devine Shreds NY Times for Clinging to Hunter Biden Laptop...
MSNBC Host's Claim WSJ's Report About Biden Feebleness Has Been Debunked Gets Debunked
Let’s Talk About That Leaked Jan 6 Tape Featuring Nancy Pelosi
Unity President Again Tells #2A Supporters Their Guns Are Useless Against Govt's Weapons
Here Are the Kinds of People Cleared to Stay in US After 'Full...
Hamas Sympathizers at UCLA Are Worse Than Ever
WaPo: Iron Dome Defense Perpetuates Israel-Gaza Conflict
TDS Lawfare Strikes Again: New Jersey Reviews Trump Golf Course Liquor Licenses Under...
LIVE: Twitchy Election Results - Maine, Nevada, North Dakota, South Carolina, and OH-6
Catherine Herridge Says Hunter Biden May Not Be Out of Hot Water Yet
CBS News' Major Garrett Says Hunter Biden's Conviction Was Painful for the Nation

Jonathan Turley dissects DC special counsel's late Friday attempt to 'curtail' Trump

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

It's become a running joke that every time something happens with the Bidens -- i.e. a new allegation of corruption, etc. -- a new indictment against Donald Trump drops.


That played out a little differently this week. Hunter Biden was indicted on felony gun charges, and late yesterday DC special counsel Jack Smith filed a motion seeking a gag order against Trump.

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley has a thread taking a look at the latest attempt to put a crimp on the leading candidate for the Republican nomination: 

From Politico:

Special counsel Jack Smith is asking a judge to issue a gag order against Donald Trump, prohibiting him from attacking prosecutors, the judge or potential witnesses who may testify in his federal criminal trial stemming from his effort to subvert the 2020 election.

“The defendant’s past conduct, including conduct that has taken place after and as a direct result of the indictment in this case, amply demonstrates the need for this order,” prosecutors wrote, adding that Trump’s past salvos had already resulted in harassment of potential witnesses.

That order would, once again, basically amount to election interference:


"Some of the witnesses and parties are political figures."

Is there anything done in DC that's "good faith" anymore?


If anything the dozens and dozens of indictments might have had the opposite effect.

The timing on these things never fails:

Another day, another total coincidence!


Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos