Daniel Penny Files to Dismiss Jordan Neely’s Father’s Lawsuit
Laken Riley Act Passes House Despite 159 Democrats Who Favor Illegal Aliens Over...
Brian Stelter Says Meta’s ‘MAGA Makeover’ Will Lead to More Lies and Confusion
AP Explains How Global Warming Could Be Causing More Cold Blasts
Lost in Transition: NBC News Thinks We Aren't Harming Enough Kids in the...
MeidasTouch Observes 'The MAGA Media Takeover Is in Full Swing'
Presidential Promise: Trump Tells Press MAJOR January 6 Prisoner Pardons are Coming
Chiefs Bench Stars While Bengals Fans Cry for Revenge
Hook Em: Ted Cruz, J.D. Vance Make Good Natured Wager on Texas-Ohio State...
Biden Admits He Always Had Power to Secure the Border by Bragging About...
Sunny Hostin's Hubby Caught in Massive NYC RICO Scandal: Doctor's Oath Meets Fraud...
Office of Refugee Resettlement Ignores Trafficking to Ask Migrant Children Their Pronouns...
PEAK CNN: Jim Acosta and Brian 'Tater' Stelter Hold Struggle Session Over Elon...
Taxation Is THEFT: NC County STILL Collecting Property Taxes on Homes Destroyed by...
New York Appeals Court Denies Trump’s Effort to Block Jan. 10 Sentencing

Jonathan Turley dissects DC special counsel's late Friday attempt to 'curtail' Trump

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

It's become a running joke that every time something happens with the Bidens -- i.e. a new allegation of corruption, etc. -- a new indictment against Donald Trump drops.

Advertisement

That played out a little differently this week. Hunter Biden was indicted on felony gun charges, and late yesterday DC special counsel Jack Smith filed a motion seeking a gag order against Trump.

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley has a thread taking a look at the latest attempt to put a crimp on the leading candidate for the Republican nomination: 

From Politico:

Special counsel Jack Smith is asking a judge to issue a gag order against Donald Trump, prohibiting him from attacking prosecutors, the judge or potential witnesses who may testify in his federal criminal trial stemming from his effort to subvert the 2020 election.

“The defendant’s past conduct, including conduct that has taken place after and as a direct result of the indictment in this case, amply demonstrates the need for this order,” prosecutors wrote, adding that Trump’s past salvos had already resulted in harassment of potential witnesses.

That order would, once again, basically amount to election interference:

Advertisement

"Some of the witnesses and parties are political figures."

Is there anything done in DC that's "good faith" anymore?

Advertisement

If anything the dozens and dozens of indictments might have had the opposite effect.

The timing on these things never fails:

Another day, another total coincidence!

*** 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement