Buzzing After VA Gerrymander Win, Jeffries Gets Too Big for His Britches and...
Biden’s ‘Rachel’ Levine Does Wayne & Garth Drag at Mets Game: The Curse...
Grieving Parents of Slain Loyola Student Sheridan Gorman Demand Change: 'This Can't Happen...
Left Melts for Tucker: MS NOW's Alex Wagner Says His Trump Remorse 'Feels...
Jessica Chastain Says Apple Will Release Political Thriller 'The Savant' This Year
Man Who Assaulted TPUSA Reporter 'Second-Guessing' Living in the United States
Congolese Refugees Protest Outside the White House Accusing US of Not Doing Enough...
Houston City Councilwoman Celebrates Lesbian Visibility Week, Which Is a Thing
Three-Armed Iranian SEALS Swimming With Rifles Makes Us Question That Iran Is Winning...
Decision Desk HQ Projects the VA Gerrymandering Referendum Will Pass
Left Mad, Ratios Insane, Business Booming: Jimmy’s Famous Seafood Plays Hardball on X
Set Your DVRs: John Kerry to Make 'Special Appearance' on Colbert After Last-Minute...
Axios: DeSantis and Trump Discuss Top Roles — Supreme Court Named as Governor’s...
WATCH Special Election Results for Dems' DISGRACEFUL Push to Gerrymander Virginia LIVE on...
Rep. Jayapal Loves Cuba's 'Remarkable' Healthcare ... Cubans Risk Death on Rafts to...

NY Times' summary of SCOTUS' affirmative action ruling is 'incredibly racist'

Earlier today in a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the use of affirmative action in college admissions (good thing Elizabeth Warren got in well under the wire):

Advertisement

The Court has come to rest on the bottom-line conclusion that racial diversity in higher education is only worth potentially preserving insofar as it might be needed to prepare Black Americans and other underrepresented minorities for success in the bunker, not the boardroom (a particularly awkward place to land, in light of the history the majority opts to ignore).106 It would be deeply unfortunate if the Equal Protection Clause actually demanded this perverse, ahistorical, and counterproductive outcome.  To impose this result in that Clause’s name when it requires no such thing, and to thereby obstruct our collective progress toward the full realization of the Clause’s promise, is truly a tragedy for us all.

What effect will this ruling have? The triggered hot takes are many, but the New York Times's summary is something else:

Advertisement

Wait, really?

The Times' takeaway seems racist on multiple levels.

Apparently that's OK as long as the media and/or Democrats are doing the racism-ing.

It's got to be some sort of a media record!

Advertisement

Way to go, NYT!

*** 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement