'MAGA is the Republican Party': Mitt Romney Predicts JD Vance Will Be The...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Spoil Sport: Campaign Manager Blames Trump Culture for Sporting Shows Dropping Kamala
January 6 Committee Democrat Won’t Refuse Biden Pardon Despite Saying He Broke No...
Definitely Defeated: Kamala Serves Up Repetitive Word Salad at Annual DNC Holiday Dinner
Trophy Treat: Pop-Tarts Unwraps Tasty Toasty College Football Bowl Prize
Host of Cringemas Present: Celebrating Our Final Kamala-Cackling Holiday Season
State of the Chart: Chris Cillizza Blind to Fox News Post-Election Viewership Rise
Poll Position: Pollster Who Had Kamala Winning Iowa is Refuting Election Interference Clai...
Kamala Eyeing Full-Court Shot at Presidency Despite California Governorship Layup
ABC News Sends ‘Regrets’ But No Apology for Trump Rape Lies Spread by...
Seven Years Ago, Disney Enacted Order 66 on the Movie Industry (but We...
Israel Closing Embassy in Ireland, Citing 'Extreme Anti-Israel Polices' of Government
Infectious Disease Doc Gets WRECKED for Calling Lockdowns a 'Necessary Evil'
J. K. Rowling Pitches an Amazing New Action Series

Media 'fact-checkers' come to Greta Thunberg's rescue over deleted doomsday warning

Early last week we told you that a 2018 tweet from Greta Thunberg — a warning about what would happen unless everybody stopped using fossil fuels within five years — had disappeared:

Advertisement

But predictably the “fact-checkers” have been busy trying to save Thunberg any embarrassment over that one:

The Associated Press pretty much mirrored what other fact-checkers were saying about Thunberg’s deleted tweet:

CLAIM: Greta Thunberg recently deleted a tweet she posted in 2018 in which she said that the world will end in 2023.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. While Thunberg did delete a 2018 tweet about the urgency of addressing climate change, she did not say the world would end in 2023. Her tweet included a quote from an article that said an influential scientist warned climate change “will wipe out all humanity” unless fossil fuel use was ended “over the next five years.” Further complicating the issue, that article incorrectly summarized the scientist’s speech. He never made such comments.
[…]
But Thunberg never said the world was set to end in 2023. The young activist was quoting an article that was paraphrasing a speech by a Harvard University professor of atmospheric chemistry. The scientist said the world had limited time to act to reverse the disappearance of floating ice volume in the Arctic or there would be drastic consequences, not that the world would end in five years.

Advertisement

In other words, no, Thunberg didn’t say the world would end five years after she published that tweet if people were still using fossil fuels. Also the tweet contained a quote saying that if humans were still using fossil fuels five years after 2018 that it would be too late and humanity would eventually be doomed.

If a conservative tweeted something like that under all the same circumstances the “fact-checker” conclusion would have been “of course that’s what she tweeted and later deleted, there’s a screenshot of it right here!” Only the Left gets the “full context” treatment. The spin if this kind of thing came from a right-winger would have been “this person tweeted out something that wasn’t true and deleted it in embarrassment!”

***

Related:

People have questions about the arrest of Greta Thunberg in Germany

Advertisement

Greta Thunberg now protesting a wind farm in Norway for some reason

Greta Thunberg explains why capitalism is bad in her new book you can buy at Amazon

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement