That’s Eracism!: Stanford University Gets Caught AI-Altering Ad Photo to Make Students Mor...
The Banish Acquisition: Insiders Say Mood at CNN Is Like a Funeral After...
El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On
CNN's Brian Stelter Says There Will Almost Certainly Be Layoffs After Paramount Merger
Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate
CBS News: Critics Say Converse 'Lynching' Ad May Have Been Intentionally Crafted to...
Vandals Spray-Paint ‘Kill Donald Trump’ and ‘Talarico — Love Wins’ at Site of...
Grand Jury Finds Zero Evidence of Foul Play in Death of Black Teen;...
Chris Christie Is Thinking About 2028, and X Has Thoughts
The Snark Is Strong With This One: JD Vance Echoes His Boss With...
What Alaska’s 50+ Voters Are Saying About the Senate Race
Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for...
Trump Made His First Remarks Without the TV Pool and Reviews Are Enthusiastic

Media 'fact-checkers' come to Greta Thunberg's rescue over deleted doomsday warning

Early last week we told you that a 2018 tweet from Greta Thunberg — a warning about what would happen unless everybody stopped using fossil fuels within five years — had disappeared:

Advertisement

But predictably the “fact-checkers” have been busy trying to save Thunberg any embarrassment over that one:

The Associated Press pretty much mirrored what other fact-checkers were saying about Thunberg’s deleted tweet:

CLAIM: Greta Thunberg recently deleted a tweet she posted in 2018 in which she said that the world will end in 2023.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. While Thunberg did delete a 2018 tweet about the urgency of addressing climate change, she did not say the world would end in 2023. Her tweet included a quote from an article that said an influential scientist warned climate change “will wipe out all humanity” unless fossil fuel use was ended “over the next five years.” Further complicating the issue, that article incorrectly summarized the scientist’s speech. He never made such comments.
[…]
But Thunberg never said the world was set to end in 2023. The young activist was quoting an article that was paraphrasing a speech by a Harvard University professor of atmospheric chemistry. The scientist said the world had limited time to act to reverse the disappearance of floating ice volume in the Arctic or there would be drastic consequences, not that the world would end in five years.

Advertisement

In other words, no, Thunberg didn’t say the world would end five years after she published that tweet if people were still using fossil fuels. Also the tweet contained a quote saying that if humans were still using fossil fuels five years after 2018 that it would be too late and humanity would eventually be doomed.

If a conservative tweeted something like that under all the same circumstances the “fact-checker” conclusion would have been “of course that’s what she tweeted and later deleted, there’s a screenshot of it right here!” Only the Left gets the “full context” treatment. The spin if this kind of thing came from a right-winger would have been “this person tweeted out something that wasn’t true and deleted it in embarrassment!”

***

Related:

People have questions about the arrest of Greta Thunberg in Germany

Advertisement

Greta Thunberg now protesting a wind farm in Norway for some reason

Greta Thunberg explains why capitalism is bad in her new book you can buy at Amazon

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement