'You Guys Turn a Blind Eye': Black Woman Takes Democrat Ro Khanna APART...
James Clapper Analyzing the Trump Whistleblower Complaint in 2019 Now Makes People Wonder...
ABC's Good Morning America Didn't Think This Aspect of the Eric Swalwell Story...
*SNORT* Just Found the MOTHER of All Foreshadowing Pic-Posts from Eric Swalwell and...
YO Cali? They BOTH Suck: Katie Porter Trips SPECTACULARLY During Bizarre Victory Lap...
Catherine Herridge Shares Declassified Doc Drop (Adam Schiff Told HUGE Lies About Trump...
Oh, Honey... WAT? Hack Journo Drops the MOST Pathetic Excuse YET for Not...
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton Just Made the Left's Definition of 'Democracy' VERY...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Slant Rant: 'Journalist' Jim Acosta Laments Not Being More Opinionated About Trump on...
Desperate Dems May Call on Kamala Harris in Hopes of Avoiding All-Republican California...
Eric Swalwell Suspends Calif. Gubernatorial Campaign and Now EVERYBODY Has the Same Questi...
Dem Robert Garcia Wants Eric Swalwell to Leave CA Governor’s Race, Silent on...
Report: Artemis II Pilot Makes a Point of Thanking God
Sen. Rick Scott Trumpets Busting the Filibuster

WaPo fact-checker comes to the rescue after RNC Research quotes Biden verbatim

During remarks in Massachusetts outlining executive actions the White House would put into play to skirt Congress’s failure to address the climate “emergency,” President Biden told a story about oil on the windshield causing cancer — including his cancer:

Advertisement

Biden’s comments prompted this tweet from RNC Research:

Quoting Biden verbatim? Oh no they didn’t! Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler immediately sprang into action:

Remember to keep in mind that the White House doctor’s report said Biden’s previous non-malignant skin cancer was caused by sun exposure. Also present and past tense would probably make a difference if Trump said something like this.

Advertisement

The “fact-check” standards are a little looser for Democrats, but you already know that.

We’re pretty sure if Trump made any claim the “fact-checkers” would immediately point out the important difference between “had” and “have.” Also can we maybe get a fact-check on Biden blaming oil for his previous non-malignant skin cancer that the White House doctor said was caused by too much sun?

If any media outlet fact-checked Biden on that the conclusion would likely be “there’s really no way to actually prove how Biden got skin cancer.”

Advertisement


null

As they often are forced to do, the White House had to “clarify” Biden’s comment:

Can they also clarify that Biden thinks he got skin cancer from oil instead of too much sun exposure?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement