Abigail Spanberger Claims She Had the BEST TIME at Old Fiddler's Convention (We...
What Is She UP to: Hillary Clinton Tries Pushing ANOTHER Trump Lie on...
CNN Hosts Triggered by Trump's Escape From Iranian Threat
The Barbarians Are at the Gates. And the Stakes Have Never Been Higher.
AWKWARD! Sooo ... ABOUT Those 'Republicans for Talarico'? Yeah, RIP to THAT Campaign...
WI Dem Explains WHY He's 'Unironically' Likely Voting R for Gov With DISTURBING...
Won't Someone PLEASE Think About the REPORTERS?! Jake Tapper Hits ALL New Self-Awareness...
Royce White Is Being Misgendered and It Needs to Stop RIGHT NOW
Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons Explaining How SECURITY Works to CNN...
WOW: Abdul El-Sayed Deliberately Hid a WHOLE LOT About Himself From Voters (Scrubbed...
Brandon Gill Drops a Whole Lotta OH HELL NO on AOC Trying to...
Former Daily Caller Employee Shares DAMNING Story of Finding Emails Tucker Carlson Sent...
UK Police Spray Man Carrying Newly Purchased Baseball Bat in Its Original Packaging
Haitian Man Collapses in Tears While Being Fitted With Ankle Monitor by ICE
Hasan Piker, Rolling Stone's Latest Swoon-Worthy Terrorist Sympathizer

CNN fact-checker's previous ruling on Trump and Lafayette Square aged poorly in record time

By now you’re well aware that the job of “fact-checker” all too often is defined as somebody who checks to make sure a claim matches up with the Democrats’ narrative, and if it does the claim is ruled “true.” Such was the case after some claimed that Lafayette Park was cleared of protesters so President Trump could have a photo op at a church. The media helped Democrats run with that narrative, except now an IG report says that’s not at all what happened. As NBC News’s Ken Dilanian said earlier today, “the narrative we thought we knew was not the reality.”

Advertisement

Something else wasn’t reality, and that’s CNN’s Daniel Dale’s “fact-check” earlier this year on a claim that Trump didn’t have protesters cleared out of the area for his short walk to the church:

Another “fact-check” fail? Say it ain’t so!

If “fact-checkers” had any credibility left, we’d be surprised that another ruling has gone down in flames.

Advertisement

We can’t wait for the “in light of this new information” update (if that even happens).

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos