The New York Times has published this article which is titled “A vexing question for Democrats: What drives Latino men to Republicans”:
After 2016 the Times expanded the intellectual diversity of their reporters in an effort to not be blind-sided by cultural change beyond their bubble.
Four years later they’ve pushed out or ostracized most of those voices & coverage is back to square one. https://t.co/1MpKXmbwct
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 6, 2021
In the article, there’s something that’s claimed to be a “conspiracy theory”:
Just a breathtaking paragraph. pic.twitter.com/W73MG5FoHT
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 6, 2021
Anybody who paid attention in the least last year will think the “conspiracy theory” was anything but:
Recommended
i'm sorry, what? pic.twitter.com/qfLCRkhq1I
— tsar becket adams (@BecketAdams) March 6, 2021
Somebody tell the affected business owners and insurance companies that this was a conspiracy theory:
Insurance payout of 2020 riots most costly in history, could top $2 billion: Report https://t.co/AHzUPRl5ds
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) September 16, 2020
That thud you hear is heads hitting desks everywhere:
NYT literally pushing a party line by claiming the belief that BLM "protests caused widespread violence" is a conspiracy theory. Orwellian and gaslighting at the same time. https://t.co/vGOnZWAMJU
— Varad Mehta (@varadmehta) March 6, 2021
This is the gaslighting I was talking about during my panel at CPAC. It's especially aggravating because communities that were devastated by BLM riots are still feeling the effects to this day, it's just the national spotlight has moved on. pic.twitter.com/pvAo2lJVpw
— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) March 6, 2021
I am interested in how the NYT defines "misinformation."https://t.co/GFVRjEMSKS pic.twitter.com/NF0wDXPoPY
— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) March 6, 2021
also, exactly how does the New York Times define "conspiracy theory" in relation to the idea that a bunch of entrenched beaucracts worked to undermine the Trump admin? because if the NYT is saying the very idea of an inside resistance is a "conspiracy theory," well … pic.twitter.com/9NVpcRyqyS
— tsar becket adams (@BecketAdams) March 6, 2021
One thing’s for sure:
Narrative must be maintained.
— Swinging Cod (@SwingCod) March 6, 2021
And the New York Times is just another media outlet working to that end.
