More State-Sanctioned Sexual Harassment: U.K. Policy Will Let 'Trans' Officers STRIP-SEARC...
Democrats Extend Bipartisan Olive Branch in Hopes to Cooperate With Literally Hitler
Women Win: Georgetown Grants Pregnant Mom Exam Accommodation, Fight to Change Policy Conti...
Oh-So-Tolerant Lefty DRAGGED for Bragging About Ditching Elderly Neighbor Who Voted for Tr...
PURE PROPAGANDA: Media Mentions of 'Right Wing Extremism' Grew Exponentially Over Last Dec...
'It's Not an End to Itself': Daniel Horowitz Makes a Point About Populism
So Many Liberal TEARS! WATCH Epic Compilation of Scott Jennings Owning CNN Panelists...
Lawyer UP, Bro! Adam Schiff's Reaction to Trump Picking Pam Bondi for Attorney...
HA HA! Liz Cheney's Endorsement of Kamala HURT HER With Independents in Pennsylvania...
Fortune: U.S. Government Debt Load Now Seen As the Biggest Risk to Financial...
Sen. Eric Schmitt Leaves NBC’s Kristen Welker Speechless Listing Ways Biden WEAPONIZED the...
BUCKLE UP! Can't Wait to See the Looks on Lefties FACES When They...
BUSTED: Airline Employee Worked As DEA Informant to Get Cut of Funds Seized...
Taylor Lorenz FLIPS OUT in Back and Forth When Nate Silver Dares Point...
We'd PAY to See That! Geraldo Rivera BRAGS That He'd 'Square Off' with...

Politifact rates spox's prediction about Trump's electoral vote total on election night as 'impossible' (guess why)

Trump campaign spokesman Jason Miller has made an electoral vote prediction about tomorrow’s election:

Advertisement

The crack “fact-checkers” at Politifact were all over that claim, and it wouldn’t have been correct no matter what number Miller predicted. Here’s why:

Is that really a “fact check”?

It’s almost impossible to tell the difference on some days.

Advertisement

Politifact had to twist a bit to get there but they managed to turn themselves into a pretzel to rule that prediction as “impossible,” and therefore false.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement