Pro Shoppers Only: Kicking the Clueless Out of the Store Till Christmas
Bake the Cake, Bigot: X Reminds Governor Polis What Rolling Back Freedoms Actually...
Outlier Out-and-Out Liar: Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question About Dems’ Record Low Approval...
But Trump! Tim Kaine Isn’t Too Worried His Former Running Mate’s Husband Is...
Christmas Came Early: Andrew Tate Finally Meets a Man Who Hits Back –...
Kaaa-BOOM! Anna Paulina Luna OBLITERATES Uber-Creepy Scott Wiener In Heated Exchange
The Rot in California: Jury Says It's OK to Tow Federal Vehicles During...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
No, Seth Moulton, You Are Not God; You Don't Get to Define What...
Sen. John Kennedy Calls for 'Another Reconciliation Bill'
Surprise! Nicki Minaj Electrifies at AmFest, Standing Up for Trump and Global Christians
Rob Schneider Brings the House Down -- and More Importantly, Together -- At...
Tulsi Gabbard Goes Off on Islamism: A Brutal Wake-Up Call for America Before...
DOJ: 'We Will Bring Charges Against Anyone Involved in the Trafficking and Exploitation'
Hugh Hewitt on 'GOP's Nominee': 'The Assumption of No Challengers Is Naive'

'Seen this playbook used before': Rep. Mark Meadows shreds NYT/Dems' latest impeachment-related 'bombshell'

Democrats are using a New York Times report about what sources have said they’ve read in a manuscript for a forthcoming book from John Bolton as proof that there must be witnesses called at the impeachment trial.

Advertisement

GOP Rep. Mark Meadows isn’t playing that game… again:

And if this goes nowhere, rest assured another narrative-booster will come along right after that one.

Stay tuned!

***

Related:

Rep. Mark Meadows: This question should be asked each time House Democrats reference Gordon Sondland

Mark Meadows is old enough to remember just last month when ‘impeached for life’ Dems were singing a different tune

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement