Monday Morning Meme Madness
Ponder and Pander: Dem Ro Khanna Eyes Presidential Run and Says Jasmine Crockett...
Buc-ee’s CEO Says Future Focus Will Be on Opening Stores in Red States,...
Beyond the Pale: Maxine Waters Says ‘White Media’ Is Stoking Conflict Between Dem...
James Clyburn Regrets Supporting Clarence Thomas SCOTUS Confirmation, Feels Betrayed He’s...
El-Sayed Tells MI Jewish Dems He Stands by ‘Hurt People Hurt People’ —...
American Kids Are Losing Their Grandparents to The Villages
America’s Coziest New Family Tradition: Listing Your Psych Meds at Dinner
Fetterman Credits Trump’s Private Check-In on His Ill Father As Media Paints Him...
Uh-Oh! The Clintons Are Seeking an 'Intern' and We're Pretty Sure We Know...
Matthew Yglesias to Democrats: You Can’t Campaign With Hasan Piker Then Pretend You...
GOP Senator Acknowledges Prices Are Too High
Jelly Roll Lost 300 Pounds and Every 'America First' Fan He Ever Had...
Fight the Patriarchy — Unless It’s Muslims: Kathy HOCHUL Slaps on a Hijab...
Clyburn Backs Packing the Court to 13 … Critics: Then Let Trump Appoint...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement