Ship Has SAILED: Bill Melugin Explains How Democrats Lost AGAIN With Senate Passing...
Sen. Ted Cruz Helps Media Make Their Headlines About Chuck Schumer and Photo...
FINISH THEM! Scott Bessent BODIES Financial Times for Pushing Explicitly FALSE Story About...
JB Pritzker Blasted for What's NOT Mentioned in His Post About Firefighter Who...
OOF: Hakeem Jeffries Thinks Democrats Won the DHS Funding Battle, but Ultimately They...
Is There a Second Sunken Sphinx? Speculation Abounds as Twitter Fun Ensues
The Rise of Public Schools in the American Nation: When and Why They...
You're Not the 51st State (Yet): Toronto Mayor Goes on Bizarre Rant Demanding...
From Gifts and Games to Pure Evil: The Vile Leftist Comments on Karoline...
Broom Schtick: ‘Black Snape’ Memes Explode Online After AI-Generated Rap Video Goes Viral
The Economist: Soaring Number of Canadian Muslim Schools Traced to Islamophobia
SCHUMER SHUTDOWN SALE: 60% Off VIP Memberships!
The Economist: A Month of Bombing Iran Has Achieved Nothing
WSJ: Cancellation of Student Visas Has Left Africa’s Brightest With Broken Dreams
Dems Shut Down Govt, TSA Goes Unpaid — CNN Mad at Rick Scott...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos