The Actual Problem in the Clancy Mistrial Wasn’t the Holdout — It Was...
Joy Reid Couldn’t Wash It Off: Wajahat Ali Goes Shopping for a New...
Arlington County to Pay Families of Wage-Earners Detained by ICE Up to $2,000
Danbury, Connecticut City Council Votes to Allow Noncitizens to Be Hired As Police...
Caught on Tape: Nebraska 'Independent' Admits He Only Backed the Wall to Win...
Site Runs 'Hit Piece' on CA Assemblyman Who Sent $6 Million to His...
'Do Us a Favor and Stay Home': Families Confront Mamdani Over 9/11 Ceremony
CNN’s Anderson Cooper Examines the Need for Climate Justice ($$$) in Nepal
American Heroes of 9/11: Welles Crowther
Cartoon Cancer: Animated Gavin Newsom Says Having the DSA Under the Dems' ‘Big...
Prof Says ‘Someone Can Do the Funniest Thing’ to Nick Shirley Before the...
Hasan Piker: Telling NYC’s Mayor to Skip 9/11 Ceremonies Is ‘Racist Against Muslims’
MI Dem Senate Hopeful El-Sayed: 9/11 Was Bad, but We Need to Center...
People LOVE How Ted Cruz Patted Chris Murphy on the Head for His...
CODEPINK Files a Complaint Over Israeli Bath Salts. Yes, Really.
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement