X Disagrees That You Reduce Crime by Reducing Poverty
Dude, Where’s My Party?: James Carville and Donny Deutsch Hold Cope Session for...
WNBA Players’ Union Says They Will Not Be Used As Political Pawns, Call...
The WNBA Refuses to Say It’s for Women, Then Punishes the Women Who...
John Pavlovitz Defends Fauci by Reminding Us That Rand Paul Isn’t a Doctor
Lost and Tossed: DSA Co-Chair Serves Up Word Salad When Pushed on ‘Open...
'Cancel Thanksgiving' Francesca Hong Says All Her Opponent Talks About Is Culture Wars
'Get Comfy Being Ruthless,' Says Kamala — Same Party That Already Tried Everything...
Vice President JD Vance on 'Odd' Abdul El-Sayed: 'The Guy's Crazy and Would...
Bad Sign for the Left? Jill Biden Aide Crosses Party Lines to Endorse...
Attorneys General From Three States Subpoena Anthony Fauci
WNBA Commissioner Reacts to Two Male Ex-NBA Players Vying to Join the Women’s...
Hasan Piker Imagines the Complaints If Charlie Kirk Were Stumping for GOP Candidates
Royce White Says She's Getting Hate When She Just Wants to Hoop With...
Terrible Person, Worse Comedian: Mike Rogers Gets the Last Laugh As El-Sayed’s Zinger...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement