The New Yorker's Review of JD Vance's New Book Is a 'Distasteful' Blend...
MAZE's Flashback to Brian Stelter Driving the Final Nail Into the 'Journalism' Coffin...
Scott Jennings Sinks CNN Panelist's BS About How Obama Defeated Reflecting Pool Algae...
Tim Walz Took a Reflecting Pool Jab at Trump and Accidentally KO'd Himself...
She's Back, Baby! Kamala, Goddess of Gibberish, Drops a HUMDINGER of a Word...
SERIOUSLY? James Woods' Shot and Chaser Maddeningly Sums Up MSM-Style 'Priorities'
‘Justice’ for Just Us: Kamala Harris Tells Don Lemon She’ll Go After Trump’s...
Can’t Take a Joke: Doc Tells Joy Reid ‘Michelle Obama Is a Man’...
Butthurt in Texas: Crockett Bails on Dem State Convention, Still Furious Over Talarico...
SPLC-Funded Ossoff Suddenly Has Nothing to Say About His Donors' 'Pay-to-Play White Suprem...
Anne Hathaway Pregnant at 43: A Beautiful Blessing — And a Necessary Reality...
Shuck the Heck Up! 'Oysterman' Nazi College Dropout Lectures America on Impeaching SCOTUS...
Harry Truman, You Ain't: Victor Davis Hanson Sums Up Obama's Narcissistic Scolding In...
All Hell Broke Loose at Obama's Presidential Center Grand Opening
Seattle Leftists Vowed to Sit Out US Soccer Over Trump … Stadium Went...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos