Monday Morning Meme Madness
Fatal Injection: Socialist Says ‘Nursing Is Political’ and Doesn’t Start or Stop in...
Texas Two-Step: Some of Dem James Talarico’s Lies Require Extra Effort to Unravel...
No Agenda. No Ideas. Just Impeachment: Crow Brags Democrats 'Won’t Hesitate' If They...
AI Causes Concerns, Polls and Common Sense Show
Ohio’s Dem Gov Candidate Amy Acton Screeches 'You Can’t Buy Us!' at Vivek...
Laura Ingraham Slaps Globalist Media
Welcome to the FO Phase: Nike Is Getting Removed From S&P 100 After...
One Bright Spot in a Brutal Cycle: New Hampshire Dems Admit They’re Losing...
Kurt Schlichter Boils Down What Packing SCOTUS Means
JB Pritzker, Hyatt Heir and Professional Non-Worker, Would Like a Word About Your...
Things Must Really SUCK for Jon Ossoff and James Talarico If They're DESPERATE...
'STEAL ELECTIONS!' Post Asks X to Name ONE Thing Democrats Do Better Than...
Chris Murphy Thought Peeps Would Be IMPRESSED by Him Taking a Walk. LOL-WOOF....
Therapy's Cheaper, Babs: Barbara Comstock's Insane Rant About DESTROYING All Things Trump...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement