Feed the ‘Journos’: For the Cost of a Cup of Coffee You Can...
Dear Diary: Ex-CNN ‘Journo’ Jim Acosta Says He’d Fire Scott Jennings If He...
Four Charged With Using 115 Stolen Identities to Collect $1 Million in Food...
Sen. Ted Cruz Lays Waste to Officers From Netflix and Warner Brothers (And...
Mom Says She’d Rather ‘Take Out’ Herself and Her Kids Than Be Taken...
BOOM: Tom Homan Asks Why We Don't Educate Children About Trump Making His...
The Tide Is Turning: Two Major Medical Associations Call for a Halt to...
The Atlantic: 'We're Witnessing a Murder' of The Washington Post by Jeff Bezos
Hot Take: There Is Not a Serious Market for 'Hard News' for Conservatives
Lefty Activist Gives the Most Ironic Justification EVER for Anti-ICE Roadblocks in Minneap...
ABC News: ICE Prevented Disabled US Citizen’s Father From Attending His Funeral
Kevin Sorbo Says GOP Should Have Bought Super Bowl Ad Time to Air...
FBI Raids Biological Lab Inside Vegas Home Owned by Chinese National With Ties...
'For What?': Daily Mail Reporter Pressures JD Vance to Apologize to the Family...
The REAL Reason It Feels Like America Is About To COLLAPSE
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement