Jim Acosta and Hunter Biden Bond Over Their Irrelevance and Hatred of Scott...
Science Journal Nature Says the Death of Fabulist Jason Arday 'Must Prompt Deep...
Scuzzy Documentarian Rips Elon Musk: Momma Musk and Others Respond
Police Say Immigrant Who Killed Two Antifa Members Was Hunting Gay Men
Teen Who Built Bombs to Blow Up ICE Agents Sentenced to Probation
Sociopath Celebrates Stabbing Death of New Mom Who Took a Job at an...
We Used to Be a Village. Now We Call the Cops on a...
Jemele Hill Doubles Down on Her Claim That Capitalism Is Tied to White...
Bernie Sanders Introduces Legislation to Pause AI Development in US Immediately
Hakeem Jeffries Says Pete Hegseth Will Be Held Accountable for Lawless Strikes on...
Cato Stooge Tells Congress It Created Illegal Immigration by Making Legal Immigration 'Imp...
CNN's Burnett Talks to NJ Governor About Trump's Baseless Claims on Noncitizens Registered...
James Woods Has a Few Choice Words for George Clooney About Mark Ruffalo...
JD Vance Drops a Truth Bomb About What's REALLY at Stake (Dems Will...
Thomas Massie Blocked Me From His OFFICIAL Account and All I Got Was...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement