'Nobody Knows': Nate Bargatze Does The Meme!
CNN’s Dana Bash Wants Trump to Condemn Patriot Front March, Network Ignored Texas...
World Cup Red Card Drama Ends: Balogun Cleared to Play After FIFA Review...
The Secret Service Turns 161
Democrats Really SHOULD Be Embarrassed By This
Gov. Ron DeSantis Shares President Grant's Centennial Proclamation
Mournful Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy Blasts Illegal Truck Drivers
'Little Commie BAST**D' Zohran Mamdani Tries Backpedaling on His 'America Sucks' July 4...
PoliMath DISMANTLES Lefty Prof and His Thread Calling Patriot Front 'Republican Staffers'...
The Battle for America's Future Takes Center Stage
CHEERIO! Brits Are BIG MAD That Even Though They're OLDER, America Is Still...
George Washington Has PERFECT Reaction to Bite-in-the-Arse Lefty Lecturing About DANGEROUS...
'Hello Mr. Clinton': DataRepublican BRINGS THE PAIN After Bill Clinton Craps All Over...
Oh, Honey ... NO: Jessica Tarlov's Sideways 'Happy Independence Day' Post BOMBS in...
Dem Activist Pushing Obvious Patriot Front Photo-Op on Metro Blows Up in His...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement