Monday Morning Meme Madness
High-Water Marx? Scott Jennings Pushes Back on Progressive Corbin Trent Who Says Socialism...
Blow-By-Blow: Harry Sisson and Don Lemon Want to Go One-On-One With Male Members...
Crass Media: Minnesota Star Tribune Columnist Cheers Tim Walz for Pardoning Illegal Alien...
Accent Precedent: It Turns Out That AOC's Duplicitous Dialects Are a Die-Hard Democrat...
Celebrate! Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Welcome Baby Boy
El-Sayed’s Revealing Dodge: Tapper Presses Him on Ayatollah, He Cites Mourning in Michigan
Gone Too Soon, and Not Soon Enough to Fix It
Van Jones Thanked for Un-Defining Progressivism
NYT Left Baffled by the Radical Concept of a Married, Pregnant Working Mom...
Qatar Agents in Congress? McDonald’s Has Stricter Background Checks. Kat Cammack’s Bill Wa...
Bill Maher: 'I'm Not Living in Commie America' – Says His 2028 Vote...
Grover Norquist Uses Montana As an Example to Sell Tax Cuts
What a Loss (for Laughs): Bellows Drops Out of Maine Dem Senate Race...
Sen. Chuck Grassley Pleads on Behalf of Farmers
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement