Jillian Michaels Tears Rolling Stone a NEW ONE for Fawning Over Hasan Piker...
J.K. Rowling's COMPLETE Dismantling of Antisemite Is One for the Books (Pun Intended)
She MAD: CA Lawyer SUPER Defensive Over $15 Beef Pic 'Proving' Home Cooking...
Just WOW: Democrat Dark Money Harasses Own MT Nominee’s Family to Force Her...
Abdul El-Sayed Endorses Ilhan Omar and Her Behavior in the Video He Posted...
The Memes, Oh the GLORIOUS Memes! Obama Bros Interview Chris Hayes but All...
Yup, He Went THERE: Gad Saad DISMANTLES the DSA's Number One Talking Point...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
NIH Director Cooly Endures Margaret Brennan’s Unhinged ‘Misinformation’ Rant on ‘Face the...
Screen Queen?: Filmmaker Justine Bateman Says LA Mayor Karen Bass Knows Nothing About...
DSA Dial-Up: Dem Michigan Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed Says Obama Called, May Campaign...
Scott Jennings Rebukes Donna Brazile for Comparing Tea Party Movement to Dem Party’s...
Men Need Purpose at Work — Here’s the Advice I’m Giving My Daughter
From Comedy to Commie: DSA Co-Chair Says Jon Stewart’s ‘The Daily Show’ Was...
Mehdi Hasan Is Still Pretending Hasan Piker’s 9/11 Posturing and Jew-Hatred Are No...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement