Dem Identity of WHCD Shooting Suspect Triggers Legacy Media Pivot to Tired False...
Woman Claims Somalis Built the Economy and Soul of Minnesota
MS NOW’s Ken Dilanian Claims Mainstream Dem WHCD Shooting Suspect Is a Far-Left...
Dana Bash Wishes Rupar Hadn’t Cut Her Question About Trump Calling Press the...
President Trump Endorses Changing ICE’s Name to NICE
'You Can’t Touch Jimmy': Jake Tapper's Defense of Kimmel's Sick Melania Joke Draws...
Hakeem Jeffries Is BIG MAD That Karoline Leavitt Got DIRECTLY Over the Target...
Jay Jones 2.0: Ana Navarro Says Trump Now Knows the Fear of Schoolchildren...
Simp Pines for Biden’s ‘No Drama’ Days — Forgets Afghanistan, Inflation, Open Borders,...
'But This One Goes to ELEVEN!' Ilhan Omar and the Fantastic Flub Heard...
Teachers’ Unions: Taking Teachers’ Money, Paying Themselves, Laundering the Rest to Democr...
Rep. Andy Ogles Says There Was a Reporter Who Said, 'I Hope They...
Chuck Todd Says Trump Doesn’t Care About the Safety of Anyone in His...
CA’s First Partner Shocked Seeing Trump Speak to a Female Journalist With That...
Sick Twist: Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi Says Trump’s Popularity Problem Justifies Attempts on...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement