‘Compassionate Caregiver’ in Florida Faces Firestorm for Gloating Over Charlie Kirk’s Assa...
CBS News: Did Two Million Germans Just Vote to Put Neo-Nazis in Power?
Marriage, Motherhood, and a Voucher From Day One
Jamie Raskin Says ‘Nobody Supports Hamas’ After Being Shown a Clip of Hasan...
Gee, Why Did Ilhan Omar Turn Off the Replies for This Labor Day...
Ted Lieu Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About What Must Be a...
BOOHOO! Susan Sarandon Says She's Losing Roles Because She Supports Palestine (Blaming Isr...
HAAAAA! X User Asked for the Worst Tweet Ever — X Delivered 5.6M...
Socialism 2026: Silly Socialists Spewing Solipsistic Sludge
How Hard Did Trump Laugh at Mark Kelly LASHING Out at Him in...
American Heroes of 9/11: Todd Beamer and the Passengers of Flight 93
James Talarico Just Went Full Hillary 2016 (and Hopefully With the Same Election...
Democrats RUSH to CONDEMN Attack on Amy Acton … There's Just a Few...
Well, Well, WELL: DataRepublican Thread-Drops Receipts on Anti-Trump VoteVets – GUESS Who...
Abdul El-Sayed's Reason to Abolish ICE Is Both Maddening and Moronic
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement