There's Been a THIRD Arrest but ABC News STILL Doesn't Want to Ruin...
AOC's Political Future Crumbling? Democrats Warn Her To ‘Stay Away'
Here's a Flashback Reminder Ahead of the Midterms of the Ease With Which...
COVID Fraud Chris Cuomo Says Scott Jennings ‘Has a Lot to Answer for...
Todd Blanche Caught ABC's Martha Raddatz Pushing More BS, So She Wanted to...
Senate Dems Skipped a Hearing on Protecting Women's Sports, So Guess Who Else...
DHS Has 4 Words (and 1 GIF) for 'Migrant Caravan' Reportedly Headed Toward...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Americans Are Moving to Poland for Safety, but They’re Celebrating Policies They Won’t...
Jameis Winston Turns His Infamous Publix Crab Leg Moment Into Pure Comedy Gold
Sen. Jim Banks Makes Case for Space Force in Indiana
Trump Intervenes After Overnight ICE Order Sparks Base Revolt: ‘No One Is Off...
The Kids Are Absolutely Not OK: Two Teen Strangers Met Online to Plot...
Hugh Hewitt Notices Where Talking Politics Is Hard
Newspaper Endorsement Called El-Sayed a Capitalist and a Physician ... Both Need an...
Premium

Wait, WHAT? NY Times editorial board member explains paper's endorsement isn't necessarily about supporting that candidate

As we told you earlier, last night the New York Times announced their presidential primary endorsement, and it was actually a co-endorsement between Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar:

Yes, it’s true that in their endorsement, the Times editorial board referred to Warren as a “gifted storyteller.” That laugh riot aside, why does the NYT editorial board support those two candidates? Well, according to board member Mara Gay, it doesn’t mean the Times supports them, or something:

Oh. So the point of an endorsement would be… what exactly?

Maybe that’s just a bit of backpedaling due to blowback over their ridiculous “co-endorsement” shtick.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement