In the wake of the IG report on the FBI’s Russia investigation and all the “mistakes” that were made along the way, according to Michael Horowitz’s investigation of the investigation, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson has a lot of questions:
There were such big issues 20 yrs ago that FBI had to institute "Woods Procedures" to fix them. But as we see, FBI didn't follow Woods w/Page wiretap. So what was the point? How many other wiretaps were same? If it's downplayed as "clerical error," then what's changed in 20 yrs? https://t.co/P7PRZs5dIN
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) December 11, 2019
But wait, there’s more:
Does anybody think an FBI lawyer who boldly falsified docs and misrepresented– did it just once and got caught the first time? Did FBI agents who made 17 egregious mistakes on wiretaps, omitting exculpatory evidence, only do that once and get caught the first time? https://t.co/DBxYkWYWoO
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) December 11, 2019
IG Horowitz is currently testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Attkisson has suggested a question that we hope is asked:
Recommended
Q for Horowitz: Who was it who decided to frame your report in terms of "no political bias," which was not the question that was asked in the first place?
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) December 11, 2019
One thing’s for sure: If that question is asked and answered the MSM will likely just happen to not be paying attention at that particular moment.
excellent question, who will have the stones to ask him
— Ben Matlock (@BenMatlock215) December 11, 2019
Based on Sen. Lindsey Graham’s opening statement, he might go there. Stay tuned.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member