After about five hours worth of testimony from former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, the Democrats were able to add another item to their list of possible impeachable offenses: Mean tweets:
Schiff just now, to Yovanovitch about this Trump tweet: "Some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously." https://t.co/fWDZTJOgbw
— Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) November 15, 2019
But when everything is taken into consideration, the entire hearing boiled down to this:
.@RepChrisStewart: "Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?"
Yovanovitch : "No."
Your tax dollars are funding this…pic.twitter.com/EtY5rKomzK
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) November 15, 2019
And you’ll notice a Republican asked the question, because the Democrats already knew the answer so they weren’t going there.
Bravo from @RepChrisStewart, who just summarized this whole hearing:
Q: "Do you have any information regarding POTUS accepting bribes?"
Yovanovitch: "No"
Q: Do you have any evidence of any criminal activity from POTUS?"
Yovanovitch: "No"
That, there, should be the ballgame
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 15, 2019
Should be the ballgame, @RepMarkMeadows. Of course, when you have #noevidence you move to hearsay and attempting dramatic moments. #DemsGotNothing #TeaParty #MAGA https://t.co/YvWQum5EHs
— Jenny Beth Martin (@jennybethm) November 15, 2019
Dems will probably come up with something else by the time the next hearing rolls around.
you’re dismissed https://t.co/iZ024TQaoW
— david tucker (@assuredtruckser) November 15, 2019
A game-over moment https://t.co/QlUxvfWNyR
— Moise Dukuzimana (@mxdukuzimana) November 15, 2019
Schiff would never admit that.
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.