Princeton Hunger Strikers Now Complaining School Officials Aren't Monitoring Their Medical...
This Week's Unsung Hero: Contractor Paints Over Protesters Standing in Front of Vandalized...
Sheer Panda-monium in China: Taizhou Zoo Unveils Unique New 'Panda Exhibit'
Politico: ‘Swagger’ Was Once Journalism’s Calling Card
AGHamilton Shares Poignant and Personal Insight into the Jewish Experience After October 7
Brian Krassenstein Tries to White Knight for Kathy Hochul After Racist Computer Remark
Randi Weingarten Horrified by School Closures - In Gaza
John Fetterman Should Be Awarded Ownership of TikTok After this Sick Twitter Burn
Politico: Biden Administration Holding Up Delivery of Bombs to Israel to Send a...
John Kirby Says You Can't Eliminate Hamas Through Military Operations
Kristi Noem and Fox Host Engage in Heated Verbal Sparring Match About her...
What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong?! Denver Sets Up Hotline for Residents to Host...
Biden: Not Only Did Illegal Immigrants Build This Country, They’re Also Model Citizens
One of Biden's Illegal Immigrants Picked the Wrong State to Terrorize a Young...
WOMP WOMP: Jeff Bezos Invested $60 MILLION in Florida Lab-Grown Meat Before DeSantis...

'Just a lie’: Vox slammed for claiming Clarence Thomas said slavery was 'just fine for human dignity'

Advertisement

Here’s a portion of what Thomas wrote in his dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage:

The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.”

A Voxsplainer summed it up this way:

Yes, you read that correctly. He said that slavery did not have any impact on enslaved people’s dignity.

They left out a key component, didn’t they?

The tweet was even more disingenuous:

Thomas said slavery was among things that were “just fine for human dignity”?

That of course is not what Thomas wrote, but it didn’t matter by then because Vox had already further successfully perpetuated the Left’s narrative about Clarence Thomas:

Advertisement


https://twitter.com/ravenhawkeyes/status/614682428175552512

https://twitter.com/clintspringer/status/614678691600310272
https://twitter.com/NussCoug/status/614666801335529472
https://twitter.com/TAEWOONSUS/status/614664625209085952
https://twitter.com/LarryMcVA/status/614698147994927104
https://twitter.com/aliciafiasco_/status/614666230826299392
https://twitter.com/JQWhiskeyGinger/status/614826694076182528

Meanwhile, those who actually read what Thomas wrote saw it differently:

Thomas wrote that government cannot bestow or take away human dignity, but Vox ignored that to try and score some cheap points.


https://twitter.com/stevengo99/status/614820616001204224

Advertisement

They’re too busy Vox-splaining the world to everybody.

(hat tip: @WFBfan)

***

Related:

How tolerant! ‘Dr. Vox’ rails against ‘the most barbaric, bigoted’ American South

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement