@charlescwcooke This may be the most beautiful thing I've ever seen.
— ? TP-Trish ? (@wtffiles) July 28, 2014
Gah. There are insults and there are insults. Twice as good when you sound like Charles does –> https://t.co/YDFbRPidnB
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) July 28, 2014
National Review’s Charles Cooke shared a piece of hate email he received from somebody who obviously has anger issues with people of differing opinions:
This, from a member of Maher's audience who didn't read my piece, just screams "public intellectual." pic.twitter.com/LfzQOVnVja
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) July 28, 2014
Making the best of it, Cooke, who was accused of “anti-intellectualism” by someone blessed with “scientific enlightenment” mind you, gave the hater an English lesson:
I edited that lovely letter I received — for style, spelling, accuracy. Then I sent it back to him as an attachment. pic.twitter.com/nYrtIqrXFp
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) July 28, 2014
Nice! That should make Captain Rage even more ragey.
https://twitter.com/GrantGambling/status/493842033539178497
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/493841009684803586
Recommended
@charlescwcooke A work of art, this is.
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) July 28, 2014
@charlescwcooke He appears to be some sort of "scientist."
— TinyShortBunkerInspectionHat (@Popehat) July 28, 2014
https://twitter.com/Arpit_Chauhan/status/493841690189234179
A reply to Cooke is eagerly anticipated:
@charlescwcooke PLEASE post his response, should one come.
— tmi3rd (@tmi3rd) July 28, 2014
And the corrections to that reply might be even better.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member