The Durham report was released on Monday and the bottom line is that the Dem/Media hyperventilating about “Trump/Russia collusion” was based on invented claims that came about late in Obama’s last term which were fed to the media, and the rest is “fake news” history. The Left’s “election rigging” claims have been nothing but 100 percent pure projection ever since.
Predictably, though, there’s been no media contrition. When it comes to the New York Times, which had reporters who actually received Pulitzers for their “Trump/Russia collusion” so-called reporting, they’re just going to pretend that the Durham report broke no new ground and “failed to deliver”:
Ironic headline from the New York Times, which spent years hyping the Mueller report and the Russia collusion narrative. pic.twitter.com/9GjHH4CI6S
— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) May 17, 2023
Oh, the Durham report delivered plenty, it’s just that the Times isn’t going to retract anything or apologize.
Much of the media is fully invested in the collusion hoax, in which they were enthusiastically complicit. This sort of Durham coverage was inevitable, as corrupt as it is. They are unrepentant. No one is giving back the Pulitzers, book deals, or election outcomes they attained. https://t.co/34ZxzT22wm
— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) May 17, 2023
Nope, they’re just going to move on to the next bogus accusation.
Look at this — Republicans are pouncing on themselves:
John Durham's report on the FBI's investigation into the Trump campaign’s work with Russia, which produced no startling revelations, is being viewed by some conservatives as lending credence to their conspiracy theories about the U.S. agency. https://t.co/4coBQV98Pb
— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 16, 2023
The Durham report is “viewed by some conservatives as lending credence to their conspiracy theories.”
A more honest version the Times would never go with is “Durham report shows Democrats and media pushed a fake allegation to sway a presidential election.”
Pravda being Pravda https://t.co/ZSPAZ7O3dY
— Jewish Lumber King 🌳 (@EzraDrissman) May 17, 2023
North Korean state media would tell the Times to take the gaslighting down a notch so it isn’t as obvious.
No "startling revelations" to the @NYTimes because they knew the story was 🐂💩 from the beginning. https://t.co/xK7oORtHmc
— sarainitaly 🌷🐰🐥 (@sarainitaly) May 17, 2023
Exactly! And yet they reported it as fact anyway and continue to laughably call themselves “journalists.”
I think The New York Times is changing the meaning of words again. For example, 'conspiracy theory' now means 'the truth'. https://t.co/Lmtj7tEWqT
— @amuse (@amuse) May 17, 2023
How many “conspiracy theories” these last few years have turned out to be true?
***
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member