Spencer Pratt Puts Climate Cultist on BLAST in Heated Exchange Over California Wildfires
Hanging Out?: El-Sayed Equates Campaigning With Piker to Doing One-Off Interview With Jess...
He's Just SO BAD at This! VA AG Jay 'Two Bullets' Jones Loses...
THAR SHE BLOWS! Rashida Tlaib Goes Straight ARGLE BARGLE RAR Screeching About... We're...
American Heroes of 9/11: Father Mychal Judge
Hakeem Jeffries Tried Deflecting From How AWFUL the DSA Is by Whining About...
Butthurt Mark Carney Whining About Mean Americans Making Mean Memes Makes Things HILARIOUS...
WOW: BRAVE Father of Girl Disabled by Illegal-Truck Driver Hits Dems With Unexpected...
TRY Not to Laugh! Defund the Police Commie CRYING on X After Hit...
Thomas Massie's Much Ado About Epstein Was ... Nothing. Again.
Kurt Schlichter MOCKS TF Out of WaPo for Having to Issue Correction on...
YIKES: Aaron Rupar Just Told on HIMSELF With Creepy, Almost Stalker-Ish Reporting on...
CNN Issues Mea Culpa After Allowing Abigail Spanberger to Tell DISGUSTING Lies About...
Mallory McMorrow BIG MAD at Peeps Who Noticed Woman at El-Sayed Presser...
‘You Can’t Even Spell MY NAME’: Kurt Schlichter Just Obliterates WaPo’s Colonel Exposé...

WaPo fact-checker comes to the rescue after RNC Research quotes Biden verbatim

During remarks in Massachusetts outlining executive actions the White House would put into play to skirt Congress’s failure to address the climate “emergency,” President Biden told a story about oil on the windshield causing cancer — including his cancer:

Advertisement

Biden’s comments prompted this tweet from RNC Research:

Quoting Biden verbatim? Oh no they didn’t! Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler immediately sprang into action:

Remember to keep in mind that the White House doctor’s report said Biden’s previous non-malignant skin cancer was caused by sun exposure. Also present and past tense would probably make a difference if Trump said something like this.

Advertisement

The “fact-check” standards are a little looser for Democrats, but you already know that.

We’re pretty sure if Trump made any claim the “fact-checkers” would immediately point out the important difference between “had” and “have.” Also can we maybe get a fact-check on Biden blaming oil for his previous non-malignant skin cancer that the White House doctor said was caused by too much sun?

If any media outlet fact-checked Biden on that the conclusion would likely be “there’s really no way to actually prove how Biden got skin cancer.”

Advertisement


null

As they often are forced to do, the White House had to “clarify” Biden’s comment:

Can they also clarify that Biden thinks he got skin cancer from oil instead of too much sun exposure?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos