Lying Legacy Media: Grabien Releases Its Ten Most Mortifying Media Moments of 2024...
Radio on TV? Netflix Now Wants Characters in Shows and Movies Describing What...
One-Sided ‘Comedy’: Media Watchdog Finds Almost 100% of Late Night TV Election Jokes...
MSNBC Guest Wants Kamala Remembered for Strides NOT Being an Embarrassing Colossal Failure
Sun of a Beach! President Joe Biden Spent Almost Half of His Four-Year...
‘Fit for Office’ Test? Republican Wants Real Final Press Conference to Prove Biden’s...
‘Pop’ Goes the Weasel! Dem TikToker Harry Sisson Loses It Over Trump’s...
Borderline Insanity: MSNBC Leftist Says Most Americans Don’t View Illegal Aliens as Lawbre...
Sins of the Fathers (and Mothers)
Leader of Anti-Gun Lobby Group Steps on ALLLL the Rakes With Her Post...
Politico Can Suddenly Define 'Woman' Again As They Warn SCOTUS Trans Ruling Could...
'HOT GARBAGE': Joe Walsh Posts Stupid Take (Even for Him) About January 6th...
Hold the Line: Nancy Mace Highlights Another Story of Trans Violence Towards Women...
After Gaslighting Us on Economy for Years, AP FINALLY Admits Homelessness Increased 18...
CBS Sports Broadcaster Greg Gumbel Dead at 78

CNN analyst has a Twitter rule about how to tell which people 'probably suck' (Jim Acosta among the hardest hit)

How can you tell which people “probably suck”? One New York Times reporter and CNN analyst has a general rule:

Advertisement

You know, he might be on to something:

That could spark a “Dear Diary” moment!

The president also might “probably suck,” according to the aforementioned rule:

If you look around Twitter much, there are a ton of people whose accounts fall into that category and it’s a bipartisan affair. But nobody fits the reporter’s tweet’s profile like Jim Acosta.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos