The congressional Democrats seem to think they’ve found a fresh “crime” to add to the articles of impeachment, or at least to use as proof of the necessity of witnesses at the Senate trial:
Analysis: The GAO severely rebukes Trump’s Ukraine ploy, undermines his "no crime" defense https://t.co/6nulx54Bqx
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) January 16, 2020
Time again to play “compare & contrast”:
Spot the difference of how The Washington Post frames a GAO report under the Obama administration and under the Trump administration. pic.twitter.com/NJbAIYAjCy
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 16, 2020
Wow, that’s totally NOT very surprising.
Once again, WaPo in 2014:
The GAO says the Bowe Bergdahl swap broke a law. In the past, that hasn't resulted in much. http://t.co/yOvQP8gtwa
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) August 22, 2014
And for the chaser, WaPo in 2020:
Analysis: The GAO severely rebukes Trump’s Ukraine ploy, undermines his "no crime" defense https://t.co/6nulx54Bqx
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) January 16, 2020
But no, the media didn’t have Obama’s back or anything, why do you ask? *Eye roll*
Look who downplayed a GAO report saying Obama broke the law. #TBThursday https://t.co/HwPGFTN5kH
— John Ashbrook (@JohnAshbrook) January 16, 2020
This didn’t age well.
— Simon Tanner (@SimonTanner13) January 16, 2020
This tweet has not aged well https://t.co/UDJ7A0F1U5
— Jack Posobiec?? (@JackPosobiec) January 16, 2020
Lol at watching Sen. Van Hollen and @wolfblitzer describe today’s GAO report as a “bombshell”. ??? https://t.co/2U9zlNzYUZ
— Justin R. Lucas (@JustinReid_02) January 16, 2020
It might have been a “bombshell” to anybody who joined the MSM in hibernating through the Obama years.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member