Rep. Adam Schiff has been among the many Democrats who have been alleging Trump/Russia “collusion” ever since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election:
Even the misleading memo by Republicans demonstrates that the origin of this investigation involved Papadopoulos not Page, and involved collusion with the Russians: pic.twitter.com/E2LainMNIk
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) February 4, 2018
Here’s where we begin our investigation into Russian interference – with circumstantial evidence of collusion & direct evidence of deception pic.twitter.com/1tobpyCjkj
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) March 19, 2017
Most Americans have not read Mueller’s report.
Some may be astonished to learn that a finding of “no collusion,” much less a finding of “no obstruction,” is nowhere to be seen on any page of his report.
Here’s what we do know, and what we are working to find out: pic.twitter.com/kNquinghRO
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) June 12, 2019
This morning, Robert Mueller testified that “no collusion” — or an examination of “collusion” in general — isn’t in the report because it’s not a thing:
In his opening statement, Mueller said the investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia and the probe did not address 'collusion.' Watch live: https://t.co/JuMbL8yzlH pic.twitter.com/GTOdbx3iqe
— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) July 24, 2019
“We did not address collusion, which is not a legal term,” Mueller says.
— Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) July 24, 2019
So basically the congressman and many of his colleagues have been full of Schiff the whole time? We’re shocked!
— Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) July 24, 2019
EXONERATED again! https://t.co/W3cwqCAYOk
— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) July 24, 2019
Welk there goes Adam Schiff COLLUSION story.
— Darlene Sivak-Kurnig (@DARLA_1) July 24, 2019
Not that Schiff won’t keep pushing it.
To change your comments display name, click here.