New Reason to Skip Seattle: Government Says Just Flush the Rats Climbing Your...
Pro Shoppers Only: Kicking the Clueless Out of the Store Till Christmas
Bake the Cake, Bigot: X Reminds Governor Polis What Rolling Back Freedoms Actually...
Outlier Out-and-Out Liar: Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question About Dems’ Record Low Approval...
But Trump! Tim Kaine Isn’t Too Worried His Former Running Mate’s Husband Is...
Christmas Came Early: Andrew Tate Finally Meets a Man Who Hits Back –...
Kaaa-BOOM! Anna Paulina Luna OBLITERATES Uber-Creepy Scott Wiener In Heated Exchange
The Rot in California: Jury Says It's OK to Tow Federal Vehicles During...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
No, Seth Moulton, You Are Not God; You Don't Get to Define What...
Sen. John Kennedy Calls for 'Another Reconciliation Bill'
Surprise! Nicki Minaj Electrifies at AmFest, Standing Up for Trump and Global Christians
Rob Schneider Brings the House Down -- and More Importantly, Together -- At...
Tulsi Gabbard Goes Off on Islamism: A Brutal Wake-Up Call for America Before...
DOJ: 'We Will Bring Charges Against Anyone Involved in the Trafficking and Exploitation'

'Most incoherent paragraph ever written'? Magazine's 'editor's note' explaining word choice in article about abortion sparks MAJOR eye rolls

A magazine called “Mel” is running an article titled “Can men sharing their experiences with abortion make it a better experience for everyone,” and the story is preceded by an explanation apparently intended to defuse any potential progressive triggering right off the bat. Beverage warning:

Advertisement

Wait, what?

That’s… something.

“Science”!

Advertisement

Eventually there will be a 10,000-word editor’s note accompanying every 1,000-word article.

Update: We’ve made new friends:

Right back at you!

We can’t keep up with “science” anymore.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement