The Lost Jedi: People React to Mark Hamill's Claim That Joe Biden Is...
'Biden's Newest Handler': #EarthDay Brought Biden and AOC MUCH Closer Together (Caption Th...
Another Win: Judge Rules That Donald Trump's $175 Million Bond Stands
Leftist Protestor Harasses Alec Baldwin Until He Majorly Loses His Cool
UCLA School of Medicine’s Woke DEI Chief Caught Plagiarizing
Sen. John Fetterman: Add Some Tiki Torches and It's Chartlottesville
Rebekah Jones Has Dyed Her Hair and Now Fancies Herself a Phoenix Rising
Brisbane Schoolgirls Afraid to Use Restroom After Their Spaces Were Converted to 'Unisex'...
Pro-Israel Professor Barred From Entering Columbia's 'Liberated Zone' for His Own Safety
Scientific American Looks at Misinformation Being Used Against Transgender People
'I Paid the Price for Their Inaction': Jewish Student Stabbed in Eye at...
Axios, WaPo Praise Speaker Mike Johnson for His Courage and Bravery
A Tale of Two College Experiences for Jewish Students Summed Up in One...
Dancing, Pizza, and Calls to Exterminate Jews: NYT Plays the 'Mostly Peaceful' Card...
NBC News Correspondent Assures Us Campus Protests Are Mostly Peaceful

USA Today deletes tweet and edits disgusting hit on Brett Kavanaugh (backlash only intensifies)

Friday night we told you about an article in USA Today’s sports section that was nothing short of a disgusting smear on Brett Kavanaugh. After nearly a full day, the backlash was so great that the USA Today obviously felt like a major backpedal was in order:

Advertisement

This was the original tweet containing a photo and quote from the article that earned a ratio of epic proportions:

null

The tweet has been deleted and the content changed, as USA Today noted with this addition that now precedes the article:

Editor’s note: Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh has told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee he loves coaching his daughters’ girls basketball teams, but said in testimony Thursday “thanks to what some of you on this side of the committee have unleashed, I may never be able to coach again.” The intent of this commentary was to address that question. The column was re-edited to more closely reflect that intent and labeled to reflect it as the writer’s opinion.

Many remain not so forgiving:

Advertisement

Yes, the original version seemed to better display the actual intent of the article, and everybody knows it.

Advertisement

Maybe USA Today should have considered not publishing the thing in the first place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement