As Twitchy told you yesterday, the judge in the Paul Manafort trial shot down a media request to unseal the names and addresses of jurors, who will resume deliberations on Monday:
'GOOD CALL': Judge in Manafort trial SHUTS DOWN media outlets' creepy request https://t.co/1IHjg31IYk
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) August 17, 2018
Because of the media’s dubious track record, it was suspected that the press would abuse the information:
Imagine you get called for Jury duty, and then CNN wants to Doxx you because its Press people don't like the way you vote. https://t.co/pWz2NniuCd
— Lee Doren (@LDoren) August 17, 2018
A responsible press is also essential in a free country. And this is not that. https://t.co/FIJHhW4z15
— Sean T at RCP (@SeanTrende) August 17, 2018
MSM trying to doxx Manafort jurors… https://t.co/iZWzaSxRcj
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) August 17, 2018
Correspondent Soledad O’Brien served up this defense of the media’s request for personal information on the jurors:
Or, um, start tracking them down for interviews once the verdict is in, because that’s how journalism works. Jeez. Idiota. https://t.co/J55Fryogsh
— Soledad O'Brien (@soledadobrien) August 18, 2018
Calling those concerned about media doxxing morons, when it does happen, will go a long way toward restoring the public’s faith in the press. *Eye roll*
Besides, there are many who aren’t buying that:
That’s how journalism used to work. But with CNN, it’s more about raising hate mobs and doxxing enemies now. https://t.co/m0VBoOYGJZ
— Instapundit.com (@instapundit) August 18, 2018
Does the mainstream media not understand the public perception of the MSM? Also, having a judge release personal information isn’t exactly the only way the press could get interviews with willing jurors (key word: “willing”):
How about letting the jurors come to you for an interview (if they so desire) rather than camping out at their homes and badgering them !!#ThisIsNotJournalism #FakeNewsLies #InvasionOfPrivacy https://t.co/QQ5g5thIMc
— Philip Queeg (@PhilipQueeg) August 18, 2018
I’m sure they can seek out the press if they want to talk to them. I know if I’m on a controversial case as a juror I don’t want my name known by the press because I don’t want harassed if I dare decide that the decision should be different than the media wants. https://t.co/uBgFEwWMGs
— Dennis Walker (@DennisWalkerJr) August 18, 2018
Literally you can just post a phone number for them to call you if they want to talk to you. You don't need theirs. https://t.co/1GhxTAQPmB
— WeShutUpWesley (@PollySpin) August 18, 2018
Or their addresses.
“…tracking them down…” https://t.co/oAC31jksh4
— Christie (@RepRepublic) August 18, 2018
Go ahead and tweet your home address because someone might want to ask you a question. https://t.co/uTZQDILnUU
— Carl Gustav, Asst to the Regional Manager (@CaptYonah) August 18, 2018
Umm…CNN doxxed a 15 year old who made fun of the network with Trump GIF
But yeah, I guess that's how journalism works also https://t.co/eeJ3YYqnt2
— Chris Cardillo (@cvcardillo) August 18, 2018
Yep CNN has a sterling record of journalistic integrity. Doxing a meme maker. Blind siding interview with an elderly woman who attended a Trump rally. Top notch. 👍🏼 https://t.co/DWBTHQvg9Q
— CNNisMediaMafia.357 (@SonofLiberty357) August 18, 2018
The media can complain about Trump’s rhetoric, but they certainly have earned every ounce of skepticism that’s to be found among the public.
