In a Blow to Digital Media, Internet Archive Loses Its Appeal in Publisher...
Multiple People Reported Shot in 'Active Shooter' Situation on Kentucky Interstate
Colorado Congressman Says Gang Activity is a Myth, But Residents Think He Must...
'Defiant' Deadbeat Dad's Bulletproof Brain Can't Grasp Why Trump Would Need a Protective...
City Council Shuts Down Meeting When Residents Complain About Haitian Migrants
Violent Venezuelan Gang Members Are EVERYWHERE: Latest Arrest Happened in Rural Wisconsin
Former LEO Val Demmings Can’t Believe FOP Would Endorse Trump
MSNBC Writes That Elon Musk's X Is a Poison and Everyone Needs to...
LOL: David Hogg Blames Dems' Failure to Demonstrate What Masculinity Looks Like for...
Washington Post Columnist Tells Us Exactly Which Spices Kamala Harris Just Bought
WUT?! NBC News Wants Us to Know Kamala Is Preparing for Trump to...
President Joe Biden Wishes He Could Put Trump in the Middle of Arizona
Insufferable Shrew Randi Weingarten DESTROYED for Praising Biden-Harris Over Women Going B...
Kamala Harris 'Honored' to Have Dick Cheney's Endorsement (Maybe THIS Helps Explain Why)
WATCH: Springfield, OH Woman Gives HEARTBREAKING Testimony About Trouble Haitian Immigrant...

Yikes! HOW MANY Dems reportedly waived background checks for indicted IT aide Imran Awan?

Last summer a former IT aide for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schulz and many other Democrats was indicted on charges including bank fraud and making false statements. Imran is accused of gaining unauthorized access to congressional data, and a new Inspector General report indicates that dozens of Democrats who obtained Imran’s services skipped a background check:

Advertisement

Forty-four Democrats reportedly waived the background check process for Awan.

More:

All of them appear to have waived background checks on Imran Awan and his family members, even though the family of server administrators could collectively read all the emails and files of 1 in 5 House Democrats, and despite background checks being recommended for such positions, according to an inspector general’s report. The House security policy requires offices to fill out a form attesting that they’ve initiated background checks, but it also includes a loophole allowing them to simply say that another member vouched for them.

The lack of Dem curiosity about red flags in Awan’s past are themselves red flags:


https://twitter.com/welovejets/status/980775025413324800

Advertisement

Obviously there are exceptions.

***

Related:

Heroic: Debbie Wasserman Schultz kept Imran Awan on payroll partly over ethnic profiling concerns

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement