TIME Lists Some of the Ways the Operation Epic Fury Money Could Have...
Cesar Chavez Too 'Problematic' Even for the Left? UFW Ditches Founder Amid Sexual...
Proposed Rule Could Ban Trump From Major International Events, Including the Olympics
Warner Goes From Calling Kent Dangerous to High-Fiving His Resignation – TDS Strikes...
Hearing a 27-Year-Old Mom Say She Feels Nothing for Her Baby Broke Me—Because...
Cato Director: Immigrants Reduce Crime Rates, So You’re Less Likely to Be a...
Talarico Goes Full Vegan: Because Nothing Screams 'Elect Me' Like Banning Brisket in...
California’s First Partner Says Don’t Listen to Bullies Like President Trump
Fairfax Schools Releases Worthless Statement Regarding Illegal Who Groped a Dozen Girls
Governor Newsom's Press Office Gets Ratioed INTO THE SUN by Nick Shirley (and...
Ireland’s New President Says ‘Patrick’ Reminds Us of the Courage and Resilience of...
NYT's Kristof Laments Iranian Butcher as 'Pragmatic Peace Partner' After Israel Takes Him...
Bodycam Video Released of Jasmine Crockett’s Bodyguard Pulling a Gun on Police
From Rolling Stone to NYT: Editor Accused of Shielding Friend in Child Porn...
Sorry, Not Sorry, Haters But We Are Kicking Arse and Taking Names in...

Yikes! HOW MANY Dems reportedly waived background checks for indicted IT aide Imran Awan?

Last summer a former IT aide for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schulz and many other Democrats was indicted on charges including bank fraud and making false statements. Imran is accused of gaining unauthorized access to congressional data, and a new Inspector General report indicates that dozens of Democrats who obtained Imran’s services skipped a background check:

Advertisement

Forty-four Democrats reportedly waived the background check process for Awan.

More:

All of them appear to have waived background checks on Imran Awan and his family members, even though the family of server administrators could collectively read all the emails and files of 1 in 5 House Democrats, and despite background checks being recommended for such positions, according to an inspector general’s report. The House security policy requires offices to fill out a form attesting that they’ve initiated background checks, but it also includes a loophole allowing them to simply say that another member vouched for them.

The lack of Dem curiosity about red flags in Awan’s past are themselves red flags:


https://twitter.com/welovejets/status/980775025413324800

Advertisement

Obviously there are exceptions.

***

Related:

Heroic: Debbie Wasserman Schultz kept Imran Awan on payroll partly over ethnic profiling concerns

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement