Gavin Newsom Says New CA Law Subsidizes Struggling ‘News’ Outlets to Hold Government...
BREAKING: Christa Pike Reportedly SURVIVES Two Attempts at Execution (VIDEO)
Again? Clown in Joker Makeup Urges Liberals to Stand Up by Doing Absolutely...
Socialism Offers 'Liberation,' but It's Really About Control
Feds Probe Adam Kinzinger for Placing Bets on His Own Pardon
Sec. Markwayne Mullin Says HSI Has 300,000 More Voter Fraud Cases It's Getting...
Gov. Gavin Newsom Signs Bills Restricting ICE’s Use of Flash Bangs, Shock Gloves,...
Scott Jennings Notes Interesting Timing of Mayor Mamdani Releasing His Anti-Antisemitism V...
A Bad Night Is Not Automatically a Crime — and Pretending It Is...
Sen. Jim Justice Walks Back (Sort of) Comments Going Soft on Immigration Enforcement
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Says Act to Ban Stock Trading Would 'Disenfranchise American...
Sean Davis Puts the Final Mushroom Cloud Over NYTimes' 'We Don't Publish Unverified...
Sen. Alex Padilla Calls Out Markwayne Mullin's 'Election Conspiracy Claims About Noncitize...
Senate Dems Block Legislation to Ban Insider Trading, Citing Attached ‘Voter Suppression’...
These Christians Risk Everything to Follow Jesus

UNREAL: You have to see this Wisconsin Dem's case against 'good guy with a gun' (at a bank) to believe it

You’ve read a lot in the last few weeks about liberals arguing against the “good guy with a gun” philosophy, even when it comes to police or other armed security. One local politician in Wisconsin took that a step further and actually explained why it might be a bad idea to have an armed officer at a bank:

Advertisement

No, seriously:

This is part of the letter in opposition to an armed officer at a local bank:

I do wonder if an armed guard at this location truly makes us safer. I don’t want to talk anyone out of their gut feeling on this because you know best what safety means for you. I am concerned that if there is one armed guard at the branch, that instead of one person trying to rob the bank without an actual weapon, as we saw frequently before now, that we might see a group of assailants, armed with powerful guns, attempt a robbery. We do an okay job setting up our officers with weapons, but we don’t need to get into an arms race with would-be robbers. That would be terribly unsafe for everyone in the vicinity, not least our officers.

Advertisement

The local politician is a District 3 representative on the Madison Common Council. Yet another example to offer up the next time the pro-gun-control side claims that nobody’s saying the Left’s opposition to “good guy with a gun” includes police and security.

You can’t make this stuff up. “We don’t need to get into an arms race with would-be robbers” would make a heck of a campaign slogan for some liberal Democrat! They should consider it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement