Today marks one year since the attack at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida that left 49 dead and dozens more wounded. The terrorist, Omar Mateen, pledged allegiance to ISIS during his rampage but yet some in the Obama administration were nevertheless left stumped as to any motive for the attack. An op-ed in the New York Times marking the anniversary of the attack takes the focus in a predictable direction by dodging the directly related facts and instead slamming Trump and “Islamophobia”:
New York Times op-ed: Yeah, that Pulse shooting was bad, but what about Donald Trump? pic.twitter.com/RVlXO12FPG
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) June 12, 2017
NYT op-ed: correct response to the Pulse shooting is for UCF to "reconsider commitment to professors who stoke the flames of Islamophobia" pic.twitter.com/gOiYyVs1iW
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) June 12, 2017
Wow:
After the Pulse shooting, the support for L.G.B.T. and Latino people was inspiring, but Muslims became more vilified https://t.co/aO1YS9Tfcv pic.twitter.com/jwXuBu7xnW
— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) June 12, 2017
Hottest of all hot takes?
https://twitter.com/EF517_V2/status/874262042164822020
Unreal.
https://twitter.com/Real_Johannes_P/status/874269735688581121
I would use the word unbelievable, except that is exactly believable that they would say that
— Shawn Cochran (@ShawnCMemphis) June 12, 2017
Recommended
ban college students https://t.co/vRG5VAhtly
— Christine Rousselle ??♀️ (@crousselle) June 12, 2017
Shorter @nytimes: "Never mind who killed gay people for being gay. The school didn't say we should embrace Muslims. Those a**holes!" https://t.co/huYTWpej3l
— Heimish Conservative (@HeimishCon) June 12, 2017
Join the conversation as a VIP Member