From 'Not for Sale' to White House Talks: Trump's Greenland Power Play Goes...
Mike Johnson Makes Massive Prediction for Republican Chances in the Midterms
Try to Spot the Difference in How CNN and NYT Reported Inflation Under...
Trans Activist Rallygoer Solves Women's Sports Inequality: Just Practice More, Ladies
ICE Agent's Internal Bleeding Proves Refrigerator Doors Are NOT, in Fact, Deadlier Than...
Jacob Frey Says Agitators Committing Federal Crimes and Attacking ICE Are Standing Up...
Midterm Pivots Detected! Dems Commence Election Year Effort to Distance Themselves From Th...
JD Vance TROUNCES Unemployed Terry Moran For Dishonest Post About Obama's Deportations
MAZE Found a Positive CNN Story on ICE Arresting Criminal Illegals (NOT During...
USSS Suspends Agent on JD Vance's Detail Who Revealed Sensitive Information to James...
History Teacher to Minnesota Republicans: Good Luck Winning... A State You Haven't Won...
Ding Dong! The Witch Is Gone: Teacher's Union Leader Randi Weingarten Flees X...
CBS Ditches Trans Journalists Association Guide, Mandates 'Biological Sex at Birth' — No...
Dem Ilhan Omar Demands Evidence of Criminal Illegal Alien Arrests in MN Days...
Tragic Spell: Chicago Teachers Union Deletes Post Asking ‘Governer’ JB Pritzker to Tax...

William Shatner spots irony traveling at warp speed in what some signers of Harper's 'open letter against cancel culture' did after seeing who else signed

We told you about this earlier in the week: Harper’s Magazine published a letter featuring about 150 signatories that will appear in the October print issue, and basically it expresses concern over the rise of the so-called “cancel culture.” The article includes this:

Advertisement

The free exchange of information and ideas, the lifeblood of a liberal society, is daily becoming more constricted. While we have come to expect this on the radical right, censoriousness is also spreading more widely in our culture: an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty. We uphold the value of robust and even caustic counter-speech from all quarters. But it is now all too common to hear calls for swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought. More troubling still, institutional leaders, in a spirit of panicked damage control, are delivering hasty and disproportionate punishments instead of considered reforms. Editors are fired for running controversial pieces; books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity; journalists are barred from writing on certain topics; professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class; a researcher is fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study; and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes.

After the story was made public, some signatories wanted out after seeing who else had signed.

Advertisement

Among those who spotted the irony was William Shatner:

Nailed it!

“It’s dead, Jim.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement