Little by little the left has infected every institution, sadly this includes Scientific American, founded in 1845.
How bad could it be, you might ask?
THIS bad.
The answer to the question of how many sexes exist differs depending on the context | Analysis https://t.co/W68vMnVOA0
— Scientific American (@sciam) October 24, 2023
What.
It's 2. The answer is always and only 2. https://t.co/uTf1qfSaa7
— 6th Gen Floridian 🐊 (@6thGenFloGrown) October 24, 2023
Man and Woman = that’s it! https://t.co/mmrl12rGir
— Stephenia Omeh, MBA (@StepheniaOmeh) October 24, 2023
Oh boy. Scientists adopting an intelligent design mentality. https://t.co/14xkbaUV1U
— Gus (@Gus_802) October 24, 2023
It's hard to keep pace rebutting the deluge of sex pseudoscience getting published both in popular magazines like @sciam and ostensibly serious academic journals.
— Colin Wright (@SwipeWright) October 24, 2023
Is it worth my time responding to this article? https://t.co/Jvug9ctZ3D
I will borrow a billion dollars from Elon and give it to you if you change your name to Woke American. https://t.co/oySj04EG7n
— Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) October 24, 2023
To save you from reading this article:
— Winnowing Wind (@WinnowingWind) October 24, 2023
- Sex is culturally difficult because some men want to compete in women's sports
- Such philosophy has captured some in anthropology who believe discussing sex is transphobic
- Some species reproduce asexually 1/2 https://t.co/gdzln5VBiR
DEI seminar taught by corpulent blue haired fanatic is the only context where the answer is other than two https://t.co/JGXqIzuFdu
— Wesley Yang (@wesyang) October 24, 2023
"We cannot rely on gross average differences between the sexes as evidence for differential athletic success."
— Matthew Wilson (@matthewofware) October 24, 2023
Wtf does this sentence mean? It reads like you're saying "the fact that men on average outperform women is not evidence that men have an athletic advantage".
Looks like it's time for some actual science.
Sexes are defined by a difference in gamete size, sperm and egg.
— Zachary Elliott (@zaelefty) October 24, 2023
There are only two sexes because there are only two differentiated gamete types.
This is the universal biological meaning of sexes. And the incredible diversity of male-female systems exist within this. https://t.co/ypxcziggbf
This is the universal biological definition of “sexes.”
— Zachary Elliott (@zaelefty) October 24, 2023
Sexes imply anisogamy, a difference in gamete size, and therefore, a difference in the reproductive contribution.
There has never been a species observed that has more than two sexes.
Across different species, the two… pic.twitter.com/eXKwX8Mymc
“Scientific American, founded in 1845, is the oldest continuously published magazine in the United States.
— James Esses (@JamesEsses) October 24, 2023
Yet, it has abandoned objective facts entirely, in favour of trans-activist pseudoscience.”
My latest for @spikedonline.https://t.co/dAuZ3FsiBd
“For all its claims to strive for social justice, Scientific American is paving the way for the destruction of women’s sports by mediocre men.
— James Esses (@JamesEsses) October 24, 2023
This denial of biological reality is bad news for science – and for social justice, too.”https://t.co/dAuZ3FsiBd
The context is how many different gametes can humans produce? The answer is 2.
— ArchLobster 🇪🇨 🇺🇸 (@ArchLobster) October 24, 2023
Once the left decides something is true and socially necessary, they will twist science into knots to back them up and boldly declare their arguments unquestioned truth!
So tedious.
So relentless.
We're running out of institutions to stop the madness.
***
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member