James Talarico Says ‘Fellow Texan’ Who Tried to Run Down ICE Agent Deserves...
Fed-Up 'Trump Supporter' Asks Congressman If There's Any Line in the Sand Where...
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Pleased to Announce New York's Fashionable New Sidewalk Sheds
HIDE THE WOMEN! Zohran Mamdani's Explanation of Why R*pe Is Rising In New...
Toronto Police in ‘Trans SUV’ Post Video of Harassment by Pickup Truck Driver
Yes, Lefties, Red States Are HORRIBLE and You Should Stay Far, FAR Away...
Fairfax County Police Gets Ratioed Into The Sun After Proudly Announcing New Translation...
Bernie Sanders Rake Stomps During His Lecture About Which Side Doesn't 'Believe in...
Brit Lit Twit: Singer Dua Lipa Opens ‘Banned Book’ Library Filled With Easily...
Newsom Embraces Communists, Will Soon Regret It
Only Scott Jennings Could Infuriate Neera Tanden SO MUCH That She Makes This...
'You Make Me SICK, You Rotten Dog': Michael Rapaport Makes Ro Khanna His...
Elissa Slotkin Said the Quiet Part Out Loud While Panicking About What the...
RUH-ROH! DSA Activist's Scolding Thread About Lazy DSA Members Sounds Like Trouble in...
Riots Breaking Out in Maine After ICE Shot Suspect Trying to Run Them...

SCOTUS: Green Card Holders Can Be Stripped of Legal Status If They Have Pending Criminal Charges

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

Not surprisingly, it was a 6-3 decision by the Supreme Court, with the usual suspects dissenting. In a decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, SCOTUS held that immigration officials do not need to present "clear and convincing evidence" that a lawful permanent resident committed a crime before treating the applicant for admission. The decision makes it much easier for the government to block or deport green card holders at the border if they have a reasonable suspicion that the green card holder committed a serious crime while abroad. 

Advertisement

According to Newsweek, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a "scathing" dissent:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Tuesday that the federal government can strip returning green card holders of their standard legal status if they travel abroad while facing pending, unproven criminal allegations.

The decision drew a scathing dissent from liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who accused the conservative majority of bypassing explicit limits set by Congress and handing the executive branch a dangerous "blank check" to upend the lives of millions of permanent residents.

The ruling in Blanche v. Lau marks a sweeping victory for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, which had actively urged the high court to take an expansive view of executive power. Green card holders are now forced to prove they are legally entitled to remain in the U.S., rather than requiring the government to prove they should be removed.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The decision simply lowers the bar from "clear and convincing evidence" to reasonable suspicion. If you haven't committed a crime, there's no problem.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement