Take the L, Barack: You Pulled the SAME 'Ban the Media' Stunt You're...
Dana Bash Tries Shaming Mike Walz for Defending Trump's CNN Ban and WOW,...
HOOBOY: Amy Klobuchar Caught Using the Same Pic Trying to Connect With Normies...
Look Out Elizabeth Warren, Peggy Flanagan Is Coming for YOUR Grift (and She's...
Troy Jackson Dodging This Particular Question Is Just DAMNING on So Many Levels...
TWOCH Full VOD Episode 09192026
WATCH: Student BIZARRELY Flips Out After Black Pro-Lifer Hits Back on Her ‘Kirk...
Guess Who Came to Dinner? Abdul El-Sayed's 'Lesbian Rosh Hashanah' Stunt BACKFIRES Spectac...
The Hack Is Back: Podcaster Jim Acosta Abandons Pool Duty to Encourage ‘Journo’...
Judge Says the Dumbest Thing Possible When SENTENCING a Hero Who Stopped a...
Psychotherapist Tells Newsweek How to Protect Boys From the 'Manosphere'
Migrant Charity in Scotland Gives 'Asylum Seekers' Lessons on the Age of Consent
'Utterly Surreal'! Flashbacks Like This Only Solidify Why the Trump WH Kicked Out...
Twenty-Two Dem States Suing to Force Trump Admin to Issue Green Cards to...
‘What Is the Point of You?’ Episcopal Priest Tells Dying Man She Has...

SCOTUS: Green Card Holders Can Be Stripped of Legal Status If They Have Pending Criminal Charges

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

Not surprisingly, it was a 6-3 decision by the Supreme Court, with the usual suspects dissenting. In a decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, SCOTUS held that immigration officials do not need to present "clear and convincing evidence" that a lawful permanent resident committed a crime before treating the applicant for admission. The decision makes it much easier for the government to block or deport green card holders at the border if they have a reasonable suspicion that the green card holder committed a serious crime while abroad. 

Advertisement

According to Newsweek, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a "scathing" dissent:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Tuesday that the federal government can strip returning green card holders of their standard legal status if they travel abroad while facing pending, unproven criminal allegations.

The decision drew a scathing dissent from liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who accused the conservative majority of bypassing explicit limits set by Congress and handing the executive branch a dangerous "blank check" to upend the lives of millions of permanent residents.

The ruling in Blanche v. Lau marks a sweeping victory for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, which had actively urged the high court to take an expansive view of executive power. Green card holders are now forced to prove they are legally entitled to remain in the U.S., rather than requiring the government to prove they should be removed.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The decision simply lowers the bar from "clear and convincing evidence" to reasonable suspicion. If you haven't committed a crime, there's no problem.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement