Hey, look, federal judges are back in charge of the redistricting fight, despite the Supreme Court striking down race-based gerrymandering as unconstitutional. A panel of judges has blocked Alabama from implementing its new map, calling it "tainted by intentional race-based discrimination." Jamie Dupree says the new map erased the seat of one black House Democrat. We thought the Supreme Court determined there were no such things as white seats or black seats, but judges know best.
Alabama's new 6R-1D map which erased the seat of one Black House Democrat gets blocked by a federal court - 'intentional race-based discrimination.' https://t.co/MkaTlI5Jek pic.twitter.com/y6FXnXW3b1
— Jamie Dupree (@jamiedupree) May 26, 2026
In case that's difficult to read, the three-judge court ruled:
After that exacting review, we conclude that a preliminary injunction must issue. Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination. And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the Secretary to continue using this Court’s race-blind map will not disrupt Alabama’s elections (all candidates ran under the race-blind map until fifteen days ago, and all voters remain districted under the race-blind map in electoral computer systems).
NBC News reports:
A three-judge panel on Tuesday blocked a Republican-drawn congressional map in Alabama from going into effect, writing that the district lines “intentionally discriminated based on race in violation of the Constitution.”
“We cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” the panel of federal judges wrote.
The decision is a setback for Republicans, who sought to enact the map after a major redistricting ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court last month. The map would eliminate one of Alabama’s two majority-minority districts, putting the GOP in position to gain a seat in this year’s midterm elections.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the state would “immediately appeal” the decision to the Supreme Court.
If we're going to have lower courts just ignore the plain meaning of SCOTUS decisions, we should probably do something about that. https://t.co/D5Sk9kXGIJ
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) May 26, 2026
The court's defence of what they insist Alabama should revert to - which that court drew up in the first place - is ENTIRELY race based.
— Dave (@DilligafDave01) May 26, 2026
Are they saying it is race based discrimination to redraw a district that was created based on race based discrimination because that would be race based discrimination?
— Work Tester 𝕏 (@justa_j0ke) May 26, 2026
Here I am patiently waiting for the Judicial branch to decide who gets to run the other branches of our government for the next several years.
— Hootenanny Wanderer (@hootwanderer) May 26, 2026
How about we just ignore that court?
— Fiery but mostly peaceful (@agbb81) May 26, 2026
Callais said it didn't overrule Allen, which is what they're basing this on
— Better Scotusblog (@BetterScotus) May 26, 2026
Is their decision garbage?
Yes, yes it is
But it's the same garbage that Roberts and Kavanaugh voted for in 2023, and demanded that Alito not nuke in Callais
For those saying we need to impeach these liberal judges, two were Trump appointees.
1/ Even after Callais, a 3-judge panel (2 Trump appointees) enjoins Alabama from using “new” maps for the midterm election because of evidence of racial discrimination. https://t.co/goC3VIphXN pic.twitter.com/DZUDStxVIh
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) May 26, 2026
2/ Writing in dissent from SCOTUS’ decision to speed Milligan, the Alabama gerrymandering case, into effect after Callais, Justice Sotomayor invited the panel to do exactly this. https://t.co/09yD2Hy3VD pic.twitter.com/8q0DK9DD7J
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) May 26, 2026
3/ State of Alabama will appeal in 3, 2, 1….(it goes straight to SCOTUS)
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) May 26, 2026
Where "race blind" means they intentionally made a majority minority district based on race.
— Thatch (@THATCH_ARISES) May 26, 2026
You cannot hate these people as much as they deserve to be hated.
The SC will smack them for this. But they might run out the clock using dilatory tactics like this.
1. The map is not new, it was drawn in 2023.
— David Preston (@dpreston2020) May 26, 2026
2. It doesn't "eliminate" anyone's seat. It moves that district back to where it has been for almost 30 years
It will likely be reversed. There's no such thing as a black district. These are federal judges running on the old paradigm that race must be a factor in districting in the southern states.
— Victor Reeeee (@EmTeaVe) May 26, 2026
Good luck with that.
— Wharf Rat (@joshtpa) May 26, 2026
This appeal will go directly to the Supreme Court, and the decision will be overturned.
***
Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.
Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.








Join the conversation as a VIP Member