Jim Acosta and Hunter Biden Bond Over Their Irrelevance and Hatred of Scott...
Science Journal Nature Says the Death of Fabulist Jason Arday 'Must Prompt Deep...
Scuzzy Documentarian Rips Elon Musk: Momma Musk and Others Respond
Police Say Immigrant Who Killed Two Antifa Members Was Hunting Gay Men
Teen Who Built Bombs to Blow Up ICE Agents Sentenced to Probation
Sociopath Celebrates Stabbing Death of New Mom Who Took a Job at an...
We Used to Be a Village. Now We Call the Cops on a...
Jemele Hill Doubles Down on Her Claim That Capitalism Is Tied to White...
Bernie Sanders Introduces Legislation to Pause AI Development in US Immediately
Hakeem Jeffries Says Pete Hegseth Will Be Held Accountable for Lawless Strikes on...
Cato Stooge Tells Congress It Created Illegal Immigration by Making Legal Immigration 'Imp...
CNN's Burnett Talks to NJ Governor About Trump's Baseless Claims on Noncitizens Registered...
James Woods Has a Few Choice Words for George Clooney About Mark Ruffalo...
JD Vance Drops a Truth Bomb About What's REALLY at Stake (Dems Will...
Thomas Massie Blocked Me From His OFFICIAL Account and All I Got Was...

Court Smacks Down Alabama Map That’s ‘Tainted by Intentional Race-Based Discrimination’

Twitter

Hey, look, federal judges are back in charge of the redistricting fight, despite the Supreme Court striking down race-based gerrymandering as unconstitutional. A panel of judges has blocked Alabama from implementing its new map, calling it "tainted by intentional race-based discrimination." Jamie Dupree says the new map erased the seat of one black House Democrat. We thought the Supreme Court determined there were no such things as white seats or black seats, but judges know best.

Advertisement

In case that's difficult to read, the three-judge court ruled:

After that exacting review, we conclude that a preliminary injunction must issue. Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination. And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the Secretary to continue using this Court’s race-blind map will not disrupt Alabama’s elections (all candidates ran under the race-blind map until fifteen days ago, and all voters remain districted under the race-blind map in electoral computer systems).

NBC News reports:

A three-judge panel on Tuesday blocked a Republican-drawn congressional map in Alabama from going into effect, writing that the district lines “intentionally discriminated based on race in violation of the Constitution.”

“We cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” the panel of federal judges wrote.

The decision is a setback for Republicans, who sought to enact the map after a major redistricting ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court last month. The map would eliminate one of Alabama’s two majority-minority districts, putting the GOP in position to gain a seat in this year’s midterm elections.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the state would “immediately appeal” the decision to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

For those saying we need to impeach these liberal judges, two were Trump appointees.

Advertisement

This appeal will go directly to the Supreme Court, and the decision will be overturned. 

Advertisement

***

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement