Barb McQuade Loses It on MS NOW As SCOTUS Torches Dem Dream of...
Masked Antifa Thug Attacks Videographers at Seattle Pride Event With a Baseball Bat
Scorn Porn: Failed ‘Journalist’ Jim Acosta Posts Video Mocking Attendance at Great America...
Man Arrested for Shooting Participants in the World Naked Bike Ride with a...
Several States Will Not Send an Official Delegation to the Great American State...
CATO Simp Notes That Agent Who Shot Renee Good Has Never Been Charged...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Repeals Ban on Adult Bathhouses in Honor of Pride...
Nate Silver Looks at Sales Figures for Dr. Jill Biden’s Memoir
Brad Lander's Jewish Blind Spot: Whitewashing Mamdani's Wife's Jew-Hatred for Political Su...
Nicholas ‘Dog Rape’ Kristof Names Children Who Have Died From Elon Musk’s Aid...
Make Up Your Dang Mind, Hakeem: Supreme Court Whiplash: Pack It Yesterday, Praise...
Fetterman Roasts Dem ‘Crazypants’ as Media Pulls a Classic: Total Amnesia Until the...
Hands Off, Bros: Muslim Grad’s Handshake Ban Goes Viral, Proving Tolerance is One-Way
Unbothered King: Justice Clarence Thomas Walks Through Capitol with Zero Drama While Media...
Nationalism is Toxic Poison... Unless It's Ilhan Omar Twerking for Somalia, Then It's...

Court Smacks Down Alabama Map That’s ‘Tainted by Intentional Race-Based Discrimination’

Twitter

Hey, look, federal judges are back in charge of the redistricting fight, despite the Supreme Court striking down race-based gerrymandering as unconstitutional. A panel of judges has blocked Alabama from implementing its new map, calling it "tainted by intentional race-based discrimination." Jamie Dupree says the new map erased the seat of one black House Democrat. We thought the Supreme Court determined there were no such things as white seats or black seats, but judges know best.

Advertisement

In case that's difficult to read, the three-judge court ruled:

After that exacting review, we conclude that a preliminary injunction must issue. Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination. And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the Secretary to continue using this Court’s race-blind map will not disrupt Alabama’s elections (all candidates ran under the race-blind map until fifteen days ago, and all voters remain districted under the race-blind map in electoral computer systems).

NBC News reports:

A three-judge panel on Tuesday blocked a Republican-drawn congressional map in Alabama from going into effect, writing that the district lines “intentionally discriminated based on race in violation of the Constitution.”

“We cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” the panel of federal judges wrote.

The decision is a setback for Republicans, who sought to enact the map after a major redistricting ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court last month. The map would eliminate one of Alabama’s two majority-minority districts, putting the GOP in position to gain a seat in this year’s midterm elections.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the state would “immediately appeal” the decision to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

For those saying we need to impeach these liberal judges, two were Trump appointees.

Advertisement

This appeal will go directly to the Supreme Court, and the decision will be overturned. 

Advertisement

***

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement