There's an Ebola virus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo that we'd prefer not to come to the United States. Let's check in and see how the citizens of Congo are dealing with it. Mandated masking? Not quite. Instead, they're burning down treatment centers.
7 Ebola patients escaped from a hospital in Monbgwalu, Congo after it was attacked by angry relatives. This is the 3rd incident in recent days - RFI
— BNO News (@BNOFeed) May 25, 2026
After it was attacked by angry relatives, huh? But wait, there's more:
People set fire to an Ebola treatment center in a town at the heart of the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo on after being stopped from retrieving the body of a local man, a witness and a senior police officer say. https://t.co/DldM0Wi2hx
— NBC News (@NBCNews) May 22, 2026
The Associated Press reports:
People set fire to an Ebola treatment center in a town at the heart of the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo on Thursday after being stopped from retrieving the body of a local man, a witness and a senior police officer said, as fear and anger grow over a health crisis that doctors are struggling to contain.
…
The bodies of those who die from Ebola can be highly contagious and lead to further spread when people prepare bodies for burial and gather for funerals. The dangerous work of burying suspected victims is being managed wherever possible by authorities, which can be met by protests from victims’ families and friends.
The center in Rwampara was burned by local youths who became angry while trying to retrieve the body of a friend who had apparently died of Ebola, according to a witness who spoke to The Associated Press by telephone.
“The police intervened to try to calm the situation, but unfortunately they were unsuccessful,” said Alexis Burata, a local student who said he was in the area. “The young people ended up setting fire to the center. That’s the situation.”
So … local youths burn down a treatment center to retrieve the Ebola-infected body of a friend.
ABC News reports that "experts" warn that travel restrictions to keep Ebola from infecting the U.S. can have "unintended consequences."
As the U.S. restricts some travelers from entering the country amid an Ebola outbreak, experts warn that broader bans can have unintended consequences. https://t.co/9vdcCK3ESc
— ABC News (@ABC) May 23, 2026
Like what? Dr. Jade Cobern reports:
"With Ebola, the key issue is not casual travel, it's whether infected or exposed people can be identified, isolated and monitored," said John Brownstein, an epidemiologist and chief innovation Officer at Boston Children's Hospital and ABC News medical contributor.
Brownstein said a temporary, specific and targeted travel policy may help protect the U.S. homeland from cases initially, but only as part of larger evidence-based strategies to stop spread at the source.
"We always worry that broad travel restrictions offer people a false sense of safety. Incubation periods can vary and people may not be aware of their own exposures to people with a virus,” Brownstein said.
…
Others pointed to the failures of previous travel bans, such as during the early days of the COVID-19 global pandemic.
"A broad travel ban does not make sense based on what we know so far," Dr. Krutika Kuppalli, a Dallas-based infectious disease physician who specializes in emerging infections, told ABC News. "If the goal is truly to reduce risk, policies need to be grounded in epidemiology and exposure risk, not nationality."
According to the story, there isn't even a travel ban. U.S. nationals returning from Congo, Uganda, and South Sudan within the last 21 days will be funneled to Dulles Airport in Virginia, to be screened for symptoms and interviewed about possible exposure. But let's not resort to national travel bans. Let's listen to the COVID-19 experts.
Broader impacts? Unintended consequences? Like not importing so damn many third-world problems and diseases into this country?
— LarsKerch (@LJKerch) May 23, 2026
"Others pointed to the failures of previous travel bans, such as during the early days of the COVID-19 global pandemic."
— Common Sense (@mywitsendalso) May 23, 2026
Here's the Democrats in NYC throwing a C19 parade because Trump's China travel ban was "racist"https://t.co/11gGjkY9xJ
Go fuck yourself. The US has no fucking obligation to open its borders at any time.
— Vlad (@OrwellsNotebook) May 23, 2026
Those consequences are intended. Keep them all out.
— Keller Dover (@mcg089) May 24, 2026
We simply can’t let something like a deadly third world epidemic interrupt the mass replacement of Americans by third worlders! https://t.co/pQ3C6SAmeR
— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) May 23, 2026
We should ban everyone trying to get here. Including whoever wrote this idiotic post.
— Conservative Heidi 🇺🇸💪🏻🗑️ (@Heidi5Red) May 24, 2026
We don’t need anything these people could possibly bring to the US
— JDubsDoubleGat (@RealDoubleGat) May 24, 2026
The "experts" flooded our country will third-world savages.
— Cass Barrett (@cassbarrett16) May 24, 2026
America for the benefit of Americans is our priority now. And you people have no one to blame but yourselves.
Please take this advice, if the press and government are saying that you should worry about something - it's not true. When they tell you not to worry about something - worry.
— Moff's Musings (@Moff_No1) May 23, 2026
You all have experience in this matter a few years ago.
Get bent
— The Dank Knight 🦇 (@capeandcowell) May 23, 2026
Why are you like this?
— ThatGuyFromHS (@ThatGuyFromHS) May 23, 2026
We think the intended consequences of keeping the Ebola virus out of the United States outweigh the experts' unintended consequences.
***
Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.
Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member