Double Visions: Republican John Curtis Paired With Policy Twin Adam Schiff - Floats...
Loyola School Paper Sorry for Calling Illegal Alien Accused of Murdering Student an...
UK Rag Says That Comedy Legend John Cleese Is Ruining His Legacy
Lord of the Rings Trilogy Has Many Elements That Are Difficult to Watch...
Venezuelan Deported to CECOT Last Year Suing the Trump Administration for $1.3 Million
WIN: Second Federal Appeals Court Rules ICE Is Required to Detain Most Deportees
AV Club Ruins Harry Potter Excitement by Whining About Rowling Funding 'Transphobic Causes...
'Pasty, White, Wannabe Cowboy' Markwayne Mullin Says He’s a Cherokee Like Elizabeth Warren
Bringing Death and Disease: Rep. Mary Miller Highlights Illegals with AIDS and TB...
Good: TSA Tipped Off ICE to Woman at Airport With Deportation Order
Dem Rep. Jason Crow Spills REAL Reason Schumer's Shutdown Continues (THIS Is Why...
Church of England Enthrones First Female Archbishop: Years of Tradition Overturned
Cringe: Governor Newsom Press Office Introduces the 'TrumpBot 3000'
Here's Springsteen Promoting US Tour Fighting Authoritarian Admin (While Trump Does NOTHIN...
AI Propaganda Video Shows Iran Hitting Baal-Headed Statue of Liberty With a Missile

AP: SCOTUS ‘Seems Skeptical’ of Laws Counting Mail-In Ballots That Arrive After Election Day

AP Photo/Matt Slocum

Things aren't looking good for a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted as long as they're postmarked by Election Day and received within five days. If you can't get it together to mail your ballot before Election Day, maybe you should head to a polling place and vote in person. The Associated Press reports that the Supreme Court "seems skeptical" about the law.

Advertisement

We would have written a post on Vox's take on the "frivolous lawsuit attacking vote by mail," but Vox gets virtually no engagement on its posts. Eighteen retweets in two hours.

The Associated Press reports:

The Supreme Court‘s conservative majority on Monday sounded skeptical of state laws that allow the counting of late-arriving mail ballots, a persistent target of President Donald Trump.

A ruling, likely to come by late June, that bars counting ballots arriving after Election Day would send officials scrambling in 14 states and the District of Columbia, just a few months before the 2026 midterm congressional elections to change their ballot rules.

An additional 15 states that have more forgiving deadlines for ballots from military and overseas voters also could be affected.

The legal challenge is part of Trump’s broader attack on most mail balloting, which he has said breeds fraud despite strong evidence to the contrary and years of experience in numerous states. Trump has repeatedly claimed that his loss to Joe Biden in 2020 resulted from fraud even though more than 60 court decisions and his own attorney general said that argument had no merit.

Advertisement

"Despite strong evidence to the contrary," the AP reports, without elaborating.

Remember when you knew who won the election by 11 p.m. on the night of the election? Let's go back to that system.

Advertisement

Let's have a peek and see what Vox's Ian Millhiser has to say:

The GOP’s primary argument is that the word “election,” when used in this context, refers to an event where all ballots are cast by voters and collected by election officials. So if Congress sets a “day for the election” both the casting and the collection must happen on that day.

Some of the Republican justices appeared to simply assume that the GOP’s definition of an “election” was correct, and pressed Mississippi on why its law does not require a state official to collect the ballot by Election Day. Justice Samuel Alito, for example, complained that the US postal service is not part of a state, and therefore Mississippi’s law allows ballots to be cast by voters without delivering them to a state official. Justice Neil Gorsuch also seemed bothered by a hypothetical law that would allow voters to cast their ballot by certifying them with a notary public (someone else who is not a state official).

Of course, as Sotomayor pointed out, Alito and Gorsuch’s objections are out of step with longstanding historical practice — in the Civil War, it was common for individual soldiers to deliver their ballot to a military officer, for example, not a state election official.

Advertisement

Ah, wise Latina Sonia Sotomayor. OK, let's make an exception for Civil War soldiers.

This editor still remembers Jamie Lee Curtis swearing that, in broad daylight in 2020, she saw the driver of a mail truck wearing a red cap with white letters, which she surmised was evidence of an "outright attempt at stealing the election."

Let's make Election Day great again! Don't let Trump steal the election by stealing mail trucks full of Democratic ballots.

***

Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at Twitchy, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement