Rep. Ilhan Omar: Most Recent Allegations Against Trump Are Vile and Disgusting

OK, here we go again with "newly released" Epstein files implicating President Donald Trump as a pedophile. This is like Rep. Jasmine Crockett coming out of the Ghislaine Maxwell deposition, in which she didn't answer any questions, blabbering that Trump had been accused of sexual impropriety. "The court case didn't go anywhere," she admitted, "but …." But the allegation is out there.

Sure, Democrats are just trying to get justice for the victims. If the victims were to name the men who victimized them, perhaps we could start putting some people in jail.

POLITICO reported earlier this week that the Justice Department had published documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump. This is old news. Yes, there were sexual assault allegations, and they've been debunked. It's Trump's Justice Department that is releasing these files while the Biden administration sat on them for four years.

Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump https://t.co/SND4ETBm2s
— POLITICO (@politico) March 6, 2026

Erica Orden reports:

The Justice Department posted a trio of FBI interviews with a woman who alleged President Donald Trump sexually assaulted her when she was a young teenager after she was introduced to him by Jeffrey Epstein.
The woman’s central allegation, according to FBI summaries of her interviews with investigators, known as FBI 302s, is that Trump hit her after she bit his penis when he attempted to force her to perform oral sex.
The department shared FBI documents outlining allegations involving Trump.
The three files come as Democrats are investigating whether the department purposefully withheld materials that included sexual assault allegations against Trump.

We've heard this story before. Rep. Ted Lieu keeps repeating it as fact. Rep. Ilhan Omar, who now shuts off replies to her posts, called the "most recent" allegations against Trump "vile and disgusting." They are a vile and disgusting smear, indeed.

Had they found her credible after the 4 interviews there would have been more interviews with others. The evidence here is in the actions taken. She was not credible, especially since the assault is supposed to have taken place 2-4 years before Trump knew Epstein.
— Azazel (@LeonCuthaigh) March 7, 2026

Actually you interview someone MULTIPLE TIMES to see if their statesments and timelines are consistent.
In these cases they weren’t so it was deemed not credible.
— ALWAYS SOONERS! “BELIEVE” (@JodyD_Soonerz) March 7, 2026

so they interviewed her FOUR times and still could not bring charges against him? Kinda says the opposite of what you are implying. In the end, not credible.
— ChiTownBear54 (@ChiTownBear) March 7, 2026

They didn't just lose touch with her. She stopped the ruse once her lie was falling apart! Not credible.
— Kevin Burdine (@KevinBurdine5) March 7, 2026

Smoothbrains like George Conway insist the Operation Epic Fury was initiated with Israel just to cover up these FBI interviews:

Look, it's just purely a coincidence that Donald Trump started a war just days before the release of FBI 302s of interviews of a victim claiming he raped her when she was 13 years old.
— George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 (@gtconway3d) March 6, 2026

Those were not new. They had been out for years.
— Cthulhu Loves You (@EyerotGaming) March 6, 2026

You mean the disproven ones that have been around for several years?
— northhunter job Title Husband,Father, Grandfather. (@northofmackinac) March 7, 2026

So credible someone forgot to file charges.
— DEMS AND GOP SCAM THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER! (@rockless531) March 7, 2026

This is getting so tedious. They're so desperate to tie Trump to Jeffrey Epstein that they keep pulling out these debunked FBI interviews, which the Trump administration apparently just released, so they're "new" again.

As Crockett said, the court case didn't go anywhere, but the allegations are out there.

***