Uh-Oh! The Clintons Are Seeking an 'Intern' and We're Pretty Sure We Know...
Matthew Yglesias to Democrats: You Can’t Campaign With Hasan Piker Then Pretend You...
GOP Senator Acknowledges Prices Are Too High
Jelly Roll Lost 300 Pounds and Every 'America First' Fan He Ever Had...
Fight the Patriarchy — Unless It’s Muslims: Kathy HOCHUL Slaps on a Hijab...
Clyburn Backs Packing the Court to 13 … Critics: Then Let Trump Appoint...
'They're PANICKING!' Peeps Are LOVING Monica Crowley's PERFECT Takedown of the Mainstream...
Karma ALMOST Comes for Dick Blumenthal While He Lectures America About Train Safety
There Is Speculation As Midterm Elections Approach
Laura Loomer, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Green's Daughter THROW DOWN Over Milo and...
OUCH! Mike Rogers Uses 'Alpha' Little Man Abdul El-Sayed's SELF-OWN to EMASCULATE Him...
No WAY, Eh! Canadian Warns Americans That We Don't Know How MAD They...
Dana Bash Tries SO Hard to Make Tom Homan Feel BAD About Deporting...
COPE Accordingly: Lake America OFFICIALLY on Google Maps and Our Lefty Pals Just...
Abdul El-Sayed Posts His CLIP With Jesse Watters About the Roads Like It...

The Hill: Let's Celebrate the Marine Corps' 250th Birthday by Abolishing It

Twitchy

At first, we thought this was going to be some nonsense by Tom Nichols, but he writes for The Atlantic, not The Hill. So, who did The Hill dig up to write this opinion piece? Harrison Kass, an attorney and national security writer for The National Interest. Kass is apparently worried about the budget and thinks the Marine Corps is the thing to cut.

Advertisement

Kass writes:

But as America reflects on its most mythologized service, we should ask a difficult question: do we still need the Marine Corps? As Congress prepares another record-setting defense budget, the U.S. needs to consider whether the Marines’ sustained independence makes strategic or fiscal sense. The simple truth is that the Marines became redundant long ago.

The Marine Corps received $53 billion for FY25, about six percent of the U.S. defense budget — which is in turn by far the largest in the world. That is a steep price tag for a service branch with about 170,000 active-duty personnel (“The Few”) operating in redundancy with the other branches. Yet funding is sustained— not because of mission requirements, but because of political popularity and the Marine Corps’ enduring public standing.

Few American institutions command such bipartisan reverence as the Marine Corps. The Marine myth, cultivated so convincingly through advertising (“The Proud”), Hollywood (“Sands of Iwo Jima,” “Full Metal Jacket,” “Flags of our Fathers,” “A Few Good Men“), and an epic campaign across the Pacific, has embedded the Marines as a fixture of American ethos—making for a prestige that is disproportionate to current function, and making questions about the Marine Corps’ existence almost unpatriotic.

Advertisement

"Full Metal Jacket" and "A Few Good Men" are quite the examples to choose for selling the "Marine myth."

Advertisement

There's nowhere else we could cut spending first.

This isn't how we would have chosen to commemorate the Marine Corps' 250th birthday, but we guess rage bait gets clicks.

***

Editor's Note: Thanks to President Trump and Secretary Pete Hegseth's leadership, the warrior ethos is coming back to America's military.

Help us report on Trump and Hegesth's successes as they make our military great again. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement