Virginia Dem State Senator Says He Knows All About Rural America Because He...
Good Luck With That: Tiny NY Dem Candidate Beth Davidson Threatens to Physically...
Someone's NERVOUS: Hakeem Jeffries Threatens VA's Supreme Court to Uphold Gerrymandering O...
Gaslight Fail: Neera Denies Hasan Piker’s Influence While AOC, Omar, Bush, and Crooked...
DeSantis Just Made Sure Hakeem Jeffries Will Never Try That Stunt Again
Abigail Spanberger Has Some 'Splainin' to do About Her Energy Czar's Possible Connection...
Faith, Freedom and Education: A Lesson from America’s Founders
BOO-EFF'N-HOO! Liz Warren CRYING on X About Mean Trump Making Senators Work Late...
Tom Homan Compares Penalties for Illegally Entering the US to Those Caught Trespassing...
DNC TV! It's a Total Mystery Why Late Night 'Comedy' Show Ratings Have...
Elizabeth Warren FLIPS Over CNBC Host's Reminder That She's Taken Trump's Position on...
You KNOW It's Bad for Abigail Spanberger When Even Wolf Blitzer Doesn't Buy...
BAHA! CA Dems' EPIC FAIL During Debate --> WATCH 'Em Flop on 'Truck...
VA Election Guy Lectures Virginians About Coming TOGETHER Because Polarization Is Bad and...
'Nice Try'! Paul Mauro Dismantles USA Today's Ridiculous (and Ratioed) Post Comparing FBI...
Premium

The Nation: What If Property Destruction Is an Articulate Expression

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Back in 2020, amidst the George Floyd riots, Sally Kohn invited the Black Lives Matter protesters to vandalize and loot small businesses because "property is insured and can be replaced." So what if your small business was looted and burned to the ground by rioters … insurance will cover it, right? Why worry?

I remember reading a lot of comments about how insurance doesn't cover riots, and that not every small business is insured. Plus, Black Lives Matter protesters burning down black-owned businesses was perfectly ironic.

I've also heard thrown around a lot the Martin Luther King Jr. quote, "Riots are the language of the unheard." Actually, riots are the language of the inarticulate. Or are they? The Nation wonders if property destruction is "a reasonable and articulate expression."

R.H. Lossin writes:

There are a number of reasons the destruction of property should be taken seriously rather than treated as an unfortunate externality or the expression of regrettably unchecked passions. To begin with, pathologizing the act is tantamount to pathologizing the actor: Given the racial dimension of these protests, even apparently sympathetic explanations of theft and destruction risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings rather than carrying out reasoned, calculated acts with their own perfectly legitimate political logics. Attacking police stations, for example, makes rational sense. It is not the sudden, spontaneous expression of a disordered and irrational mob but the clear enactment of a political position, the fulfillment in some small but concrete way of the central demand being made by protesters across the country: Police need to be defunded, and some police stations need to disappear.

So why did Losssin waste the time it took to write this piece and not vandalize a police station or burn down a liquor store?

Oh no, imagine the risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings when they set a Waymo on fire and then dance on the roof of it waving a Mexican flag?

Not only will liberals excuse murders, rapists, and fentanyl dealers if they're here illegally … they'll also excuse rioting and burning down city blocks. Amazing.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement