Vince Vaughn Laments 'Agenda-Driven' Late Night Shows
Double Visions: Republican John Curtis Paired With Policy Twin Adam Schiff - Floats...
Loyola School Paper Sorry for Calling Illegal Alien Accused of Murdering Student an...
UK Rag Says That Comedy Legend John Cleese Is Ruining His Legacy
Lord of the Rings Trilogy Has Many Elements That Are Difficult to Watch...
Venezuelan Deported to CECOT Last Year Suing the Trump Administration for $1.3 Million
WIN: Second Federal Appeals Court Rules ICE Is Required to Detain Most Deportees
AV Club Ruins Harry Potter Excitement by Whining About Rowling Funding 'Transphobic Causes...
'Pasty, White, Wannabe Cowboy' Markwayne Mullin Says He’s a Cherokee Like Elizabeth Warren
Bringing Death and Disease: Rep. Mary Miller Highlights Illegals with AIDS and TB...
Good: TSA Tipped Off ICE to Woman at Airport With Deportation Order
Dem Rep. Jason Crow Spills REAL Reason Schumer's Shutdown Continues (THIS Is Why...
Church of England Enthrones First Female Archbishop: Years of Tradition Overturned
Cringe: Governor Newsom Press Office Introduces the 'TrumpBot 3000'
Here's Springsteen Promoting US Tour Fighting Authoritarian Admin (While Trump Does NOTHIN...
Premium

The Nation: What If Property Destruction Is an Articulate Expression

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Back in 2020, amidst the George Floyd riots, Sally Kohn invited the Black Lives Matter protesters to vandalize and loot small businesses because "property is insured and can be replaced." So what if your small business was looted and burned to the ground by rioters … insurance will cover it, right? Why worry?

I remember reading a lot of comments about how insurance doesn't cover riots, and that not every small business is insured. Plus, Black Lives Matter protesters burning down black-owned businesses was perfectly ironic.

I've also heard thrown around a lot the Martin Luther King Jr. quote, "Riots are the language of the unheard." Actually, riots are the language of the inarticulate. Or are they? The Nation wonders if property destruction is "a reasonable and articulate expression."

R.H. Lossin writes:

There are a number of reasons the destruction of property should be taken seriously rather than treated as an unfortunate externality or the expression of regrettably unchecked passions. To begin with, pathologizing the act is tantamount to pathologizing the actor: Given the racial dimension of these protests, even apparently sympathetic explanations of theft and destruction risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings rather than carrying out reasoned, calculated acts with their own perfectly legitimate political logics. Attacking police stations, for example, makes rational sense. It is not the sudden, spontaneous expression of a disordered and irrational mob but the clear enactment of a political position, the fulfillment in some small but concrete way of the central demand being made by protesters across the country: Police need to be defunded, and some police stations need to disappear.

So why did Losssin waste the time it took to write this piece and not vandalize a police station or burn down a liquor store?

Oh no, imagine the risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings when they set a Waymo on fire and then dance on the roof of it waving a Mexican flag?

Not only will liberals excuse murders, rapists, and fentanyl dealers if they're here illegally … they'll also excuse rioting and burning down city blocks. Amazing.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement