Targeted, Ignored, Spun: How the Media Failed a Nation After a Weekend of...
Terror Attack Thwarted: FBI Announcement As Violence Erupts Worldwide
NEW Evidence Shows Obama's DOJ (Including James Comey) Did Some HEAVY Lifting to...
Targeted, Ignored, Spun: How the Media Failed a Nation After a Weekend of...
House Oversight Has a Damning Report About DC Fudging Crime Stats (How Many...
WOW: John Kennedy Reads From MN AG's Office Internal Memo About WHY They...
Maria Bartiromo Made Dem Rep. Ro Khanna Squirm After He Said 'I've Never...
Wajahat Ali Rages at The New York Times for Being HONEST About Bondi...
Australia PM's Proposal After Terrorist Attack Couldn't Be More Predictable (US Dems Are...
Side-by-Side Screenshots Show the Difference Between the Evil Right and Tolerant Left Afte...
Jeremy London Warns That MAGA Will Cheer Reiner's Death, Trips SPECTACULARLY on His...
Ms. Rachel's Crocodile Tears: Shocked by Antisemitism After Years of Fueling It
Monday Morning Meme Madness
BREAKING UPDATE: Rob Reiner And His Wife Are Confirmed Dead (UPDATE: Murdered by...
BREAKING: Two Found Dead at Rob Reiner's Residence
Premium

The Nation: What If Property Destruction Is an Articulate Expression

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Back in 2020, amidst the George Floyd riots, Sally Kohn invited the Black Lives Matter protesters to vandalize and loot small businesses because "property is insured and can be replaced." So what if your small business was looted and burned to the ground by rioters … insurance will cover it, right? Why worry?

I remember reading a lot of comments about how insurance doesn't cover riots, and that not every small business is insured. Plus, Black Lives Matter protesters burning down black-owned businesses was perfectly ironic.

I've also heard thrown around a lot the Martin Luther King Jr. quote, "Riots are the language of the unheard." Actually, riots are the language of the inarticulate. Or are they? The Nation wonders if property destruction is "a reasonable and articulate expression."

R.H. Lossin writes:

There are a number of reasons the destruction of property should be taken seriously rather than treated as an unfortunate externality or the expression of regrettably unchecked passions. To begin with, pathologizing the act is tantamount to pathologizing the actor: Given the racial dimension of these protests, even apparently sympathetic explanations of theft and destruction risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings rather than carrying out reasoned, calculated acts with their own perfectly legitimate political logics. Attacking police stations, for example, makes rational sense. It is not the sudden, spontaneous expression of a disordered and irrational mob but the clear enactment of a political position, the fulfillment in some small but concrete way of the central demand being made by protesters across the country: Police need to be defunded, and some police stations need to disappear.

So why did Losssin waste the time it took to write this piece and not vandalize a police station or burn down a liquor store?

Oh no, imagine the risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings when they set a Waymo on fire and then dance on the roof of it waving a Mexican flag?

Not only will liberals excuse murders, rapists, and fentanyl dealers if they're here illegally … they'll also excuse rioting and burning down city blocks. Amazing.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement