Warren: Nazi Tattoo & Rape Comments No Big Deal — Platner Agrees With...
Ilhan Omar Caught: Public Tantrum As Kash Patel Exposes Decades of SPLC Fraud
Ex CIA Analyst's Claim About Trump, General Caine and the Launch Codes Gets...
Mehdi Hasan Loves the Shema More Than LL Cool J Loves the Ladies
Flashback: The SPLC Has Been Scummy for a Long Time
'Are You Really This Dumb?' Dem Rep. Dan Goldman's SPLC Defense Is Getting...
Ingraham Warns Virginia Is Becoming California — Newsom’s Office Brags About the ‘Free’...
JOURNALISM! Dems Will Appreciate USA Today's Hack-Tastic Spin on the 11-Count SPLC Indictm...
DEATH BY CRINGE: Ilhan Omar Defiles an American Musical Legend In Service of...
Yale Elite's War on Boomers: 'Tax the Olds, Evict Them, Retire Them —...
Dems Melt Down Over SPLC Indictment (Timing of the Kash Patel Hit Piece...
Hakeem Throws a Fit Supreme: Tiny Dem Leader Big Mad Over Real SPLC...
Sen. Chris Murphy Hopes We Miss the Point About His 'Sarcastic' Post Cheering...
The Most Divisive Ex-President Can't Move On and Now Cheers Dem Gerrymandering as...
MASSIVE DOJ Indictment Confirms Every Horrible Thing about the SPLC -- and THEN...
Premium

The Nation: What If Property Destruction Is an Articulate Expression

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Back in 2020, amidst the George Floyd riots, Sally Kohn invited the Black Lives Matter protesters to vandalize and loot small businesses because "property is insured and can be replaced." So what if your small business was looted and burned to the ground by rioters … insurance will cover it, right? Why worry?

I remember reading a lot of comments about how insurance doesn't cover riots, and that not every small business is insured. Plus, Black Lives Matter protesters burning down black-owned businesses was perfectly ironic.

I've also heard thrown around a lot the Martin Luther King Jr. quote, "Riots are the language of the unheard." Actually, riots are the language of the inarticulate. Or are they? The Nation wonders if property destruction is "a reasonable and articulate expression."

R.H. Lossin writes:

There are a number of reasons the destruction of property should be taken seriously rather than treated as an unfortunate externality or the expression of regrettably unchecked passions. To begin with, pathologizing the act is tantamount to pathologizing the actor: Given the racial dimension of these protests, even apparently sympathetic explanations of theft and destruction risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings rather than carrying out reasoned, calculated acts with their own perfectly legitimate political logics. Attacking police stations, for example, makes rational sense. It is not the sudden, spontaneous expression of a disordered and irrational mob but the clear enactment of a political position, the fulfillment in some small but concrete way of the central demand being made by protesters across the country: Police need to be defunded, and some police stations need to disappear.

So why did Losssin waste the time it took to write this piece and not vandalize a police station or burn down a liquor store?

Oh no, imagine the risk of implying that people of color are reacting from feelings when they set a Waymo on fire and then dance on the roof of it waving a Mexican flag?

Not only will liberals excuse murders, rapists, and fentanyl dealers if they're here illegally … they'll also excuse rioting and burning down city blocks. Amazing.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement