Eric Swalwell Gets OWNED by ICE Director Todd Lyons (at Least It Wasn't...
Congresswoman Can’t Respect ICE, Inheritors of the Klan Hood and the Slave Patrol
The Handmaid's Tale Isn't on the Right—It's in Surrogacy Mills and Chinese Billionaire...
CBS Caught LYING About Trump’s ICE Arrests (Here’s The Proof)
Punishing the Winner? Somehow, Sam Darnold Has to Pay California $14,000 For Winning...
Bad Bunny's Blackout Tribute Misses Mark: Massive U.S. Aid to Puerto Rico Vanished...
Seth Dillon ENDS Anti-Semitic CRAZY at WH Religious Liberties Commission Meeting As Only...
He's Gonna CRY! Dan Goldman CLEARLY Did Not Expect ICE Director Lyons to...
Democrats Rage As Epstein Bombshell Vindicates Trump
FBI Drops Bombshell Footage: Masked, Armed Figure Seen Tampering with Camera in Guthrie...
Question Nutso Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver Asked ICE Director So DUMB It Made...
Hey, Look ... It's BILL! Democrats Will FREAK When They See VH1 Video...
Literally the Dumb Endorsing the DUMBEST: Guess Who Adam Schiff Just Endorsed (LOL...
As Zohran Mamdani's (Predictable) Failures Mount, NYT Focuses on the Issues That Matter
*SNORT* Gad Saad's List of Things MORE Intellectual Than Jasmine Crockett a (Hilariously)...

NBC News Reports on 1868 Ruling That Could Keep Donald Trump From Serving Again

@WhiteTallon

NBC News just put this up today, although it's been talked about for years now online. In case you didn't know, the 14th Amendment disqualifies those who "engaged in insurrection" from serving again. How will this affect Donald Trump? Several states are trying to remove him from the ballot saying he's not eligible to run, even though he hasn't even been charged with, let alone convicted of, insurrection.

Advertisement

NBC News get everyone who's been asleep since Trump announced his candidacy up to date:

[Chief Justice Salmon] Chase’s [1868] rulings have taken on new relevance as the Supreme Court hears Trump’s plea that he not be removed from the Republican primary ballot in Colorado. He is seeking to throw out a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that said he is ineligible under Section 3 because of his role in seeking to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in a series of events that led to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

“I don’t know that any one case or any one justice from the past is going to be the dominant kind of theme or a talisman that the court looks at,” said Vikram Amar, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Law, who filed a brief that mentions Chase’s rulings.

This time around, Chase ruled that “legislation by Congress is necessary” for someone to be disqualified under the 14th Amendment, in part because of the far-reaching consequences of invalidating thousands of decisions made by officials with similar Confederate backgrounds to the judge in Griffin’s case.

Advertisement

Before getting into the tall grass, prove to us that there was an "insurrection" at all. If it were Democrats, January 6 would have been called a "mostly peaceful protest."

Advertisement

NBC News notes that "the history is relevant in part because several members of the conservative-majority Supreme Court put considerable weight on how people would have understood constitutional provisions at the time they were written."

This is wish-casting. Trump will be on the ballot, and if he's not, Joe Biden will disappear from a lot of state ballots.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement