OUCH! Axios Reminds Dems They 'Didn't Just Lose to Trump' (Count the Ways)
John Podhoretz Nukes Jennifer Rubin FROM ORBIT for Claiming Hitler Is LITERALLY in...
MSNBC Celebrates Beating CNN in Election Night Ratings (Guess Why So Many Were...
Oh HELL YEAH! Trump Shares EPIC, Kick-Butt, Super RAD 10-Step Plan to DISMANTLE...
Of ALL the Groups Kamala Lost, the 1 She BARELY Kept By 1...
'You're SUPER Emotional': Scott Jennings Leaves TDS-Comedian SPEECHLESS in Back and Forth...
#SocialMediaVideoCritique: Justine Bateman Offers HILARIOUS Film Tips to Melting Down TikT...
WATCH: Michael Cohen Getting Turkey-Trolled Might Be the FUNNIEST Thing You See Today
WATCH: Jews Under Attack in Amsterdam While the Legacy Media is Silent
TRUMP 47 SALE: 74% Off VIP Membership - FINAL HOURS!
Desperate Dem's Latest Far-Fetched Fantasy: Supreme Court Justice Kamala Harris - YES, REA...
Enjoy This Photo of Two Women Failed by America and Beaten by Trump
Psycho Says She's Purchasing a Glock and Shooting Every White Man She Sees
The Most Misogynistic President Ever Just Appointed the First Woman Chief of Staff...
Republican Against Trump Doesn’t Want the Stain of the Party Anymore

NBC News Reports on 1868 Ruling That Could Keep Donald Trump From Serving Again

@WhiteTallon

NBC News just put this up today, although it's been talked about for years now online. In case you didn't know, the 14th Amendment disqualifies those who "engaged in insurrection" from serving again. How will this affect Donald Trump? Several states are trying to remove him from the ballot saying he's not eligible to run, even though he hasn't even been charged with, let alone convicted of, insurrection.

Advertisement

NBC News get everyone who's been asleep since Trump announced his candidacy up to date:

[Chief Justice Salmon] Chase’s [1868] rulings have taken on new relevance as the Supreme Court hears Trump’s plea that he not be removed from the Republican primary ballot in Colorado. He is seeking to throw out a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that said he is ineligible under Section 3 because of his role in seeking to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in a series of events that led to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

“I don’t know that any one case or any one justice from the past is going to be the dominant kind of theme or a talisman that the court looks at,” said Vikram Amar, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Law, who filed a brief that mentions Chase’s rulings.

This time around, Chase ruled that “legislation by Congress is necessary” for someone to be disqualified under the 14th Amendment, in part because of the far-reaching consequences of invalidating thousands of decisions made by officials with similar Confederate backgrounds to the judge in Griffin’s case.

Advertisement

Before getting into the tall grass, prove to us that there was an "insurrection" at all. If it were Democrats, January 6 would have been called a "mostly peaceful protest."

Advertisement

NBC News notes that "the history is relevant in part because several members of the conservative-majority Supreme Court put considerable weight on how people would have understood constitutional provisions at the time they were written."

This is wish-casting. Trump will be on the ballot, and if he's not, Joe Biden will disappear from a lot of state ballots.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement