Civil Rights Head Says ABC News Had a Strong Defense Against Trump Claim
President Who Just Pardoned His Son for Gun Crimes Calls on Nation to...
SICKNESS: Donald Trump Speaks Out Against Lefties Who Love United Healthcare CEO Murderer...
Commie Professor Notes You're More Likely to Be Killed by a CEO Than...
ICE Man: Republican Virginia Governor Has Stubborn Democrat Sanctuary Cities in His Sights
So Science-y! Icelandic Activist Faces PRISON Time for Criticizing Notion Men Can Breastfe...
Hogg Wild! MAGA Celebrates Young Democrat Activist Officially Vying for DNC Vice Chair
Despicable: Damning Thread Shows How Consulting Firm McKinsey Fueled Opioid Crisis, Worked...
Madison Police Say Shooter Was a Teenager Who Attended the School; Three Dead
ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Trump Says He's Suing Pollster Ann Selzer and '60 Minutes', Citing...
Oh, So NOW a Weaponized IRS Is a Bad Thing? Billionaire Fears Trump...
Senate Democrats Seek to Disenfranchise Millions, Introduce Bill to Abolish Electoral Coll...
EL OH EL! Lyin' Biden Laughably Claims He Ran a 'Scandal Free' Campaign...
WHOA and 'JUST IN': Justin Trudeau Considering Resigning According to CTV News
Adam Schiff-For-Brains Sweats BULLETS Making These Claims About His Work on the J6...
Premium

Study: Massive Black Lives Matters protests may have slowed coronavirus spread in large cities

This week we’ve heard on the news that there’s been a huge uptick in COVID-19 cases nationwide, and people supposedly smarter than us are pinning it on all on those Memorial Day get-togethers and not the massive, international George Floyd/Black Lives Matter protests.

This is actually the second study we’ve seen suggesting that those protests actually slowed the spread of the coronavirus. Just last week, a study released by the National Bureau of Economic Research found no evidence that coronavirus cases jumped in 315 cities in the weeks following the first protests.

Why? “Researchers determined that protests may have been offset by an increase in social distancing among those who decided not to march.” In other words, there was more social distancing by all of the people who avoided the protests because they were afraid of violence or general unrest. But we thought all those people were locked down anyway.

Now there’s another study suggesting that not only didn’t the massive gatherings increase the spread of the coronavirus — they actually slowed the spread of the coronavirus.

Why? Same reason:

… a new study by a nationwide research team that includes a University of Colorado Denver professor has found something surprising: The protests may have slowed the overall spread of the coronavirus in cities with large demonstrations, including Denver.

“We think that what’s going on is it’s the people who are not going to protest are staying away,” said Andrew Friedson, the CU-Denver professor who is one of the paper’s co-authors. “The overall effect for the entire city is more social distancing because people are avoiding the protests.”

So those massive gatherings you saw were offset by people who were probably going to stay home anyway, get it?

Check back next week to see if there isn’t yet another study suggesting the protests slowed the spread of coronavirus.


Related:

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement