Spin and Grin: Mayor Mamdani Tells Jon Stewart DSA Members Disagree on Abolishing...
MS NOW’s Molly Jong-Fast Mad Trump Is Using Fact Non-Citizens Are Voting to...
Hot Take: We Know About the Noncitizens Voting in NJ *Because* Our Elections...
Jennifer Welch: Homeschooling Is 'Inherently Patriarchal' and a 'Huge Push of the Fascist...
Mehdi Hasan Explains to Javier Bardem How Spain's World Cup Win Was a...
Why the ‘Conservatives Are Incurious’ Smear Is Pure Projection
ActBlue Fraud Hits El-Sayed Campaign: 88yo No-Computer Granny ‘Donated’ $150K (and 47 Time...
Rep Brandon Gill Introduces Bill to End Birthright Citizenship for Children of Illegal...
Fifth Circuit: Illegal Aliens Have No Constitutional Right to Roam Free During Removal...
'It Never Happens' — Until a Mexican Illegal Sexually Abused and Murdered a...
Fifteen-Year Pro-Hamas ‘Forever Student’ at Columbia to Be Deported to Jordan
Ratio Alert! Geraldo Rivera's Attempt to Make the NJ Voting 'Glitch' About Trump...
Unable to Arrest Netanyahu, Mamdani Leaves It to New Yorkers Whether They Want...
All This Dem Lying About Noncitizens Voting Being a Nonexistent Problem Is Aging...
Ethiopian Migrant Executes Three, Tells Court He Was Treated Unfairly Because He’s Black
Premium

Study: Massive Black Lives Matters protests may have slowed coronavirus spread in large cities

This week we’ve heard on the news that there’s been a huge uptick in COVID-19 cases nationwide, and people supposedly smarter than us are pinning it on all on those Memorial Day get-togethers and not the massive, international George Floyd/Black Lives Matter protests.

This is actually the second study we’ve seen suggesting that those protests actually slowed the spread of the coronavirus. Just last week, a study released by the National Bureau of Economic Research found no evidence that coronavirus cases jumped in 315 cities in the weeks following the first protests.

Why? “Researchers determined that protests may have been offset by an increase in social distancing among those who decided not to march.” In other words, there was more social distancing by all of the people who avoided the protests because they were afraid of violence or general unrest. But we thought all those people were locked down anyway.

Now there’s another study suggesting that not only didn’t the massive gatherings increase the spread of the coronavirus — they actually slowed the spread of the coronavirus.

Why? Same reason:

… a new study by a nationwide research team that includes a University of Colorado Denver professor has found something surprising: The protests may have slowed the overall spread of the coronavirus in cities with large demonstrations, including Denver.

“We think that what’s going on is it’s the people who are not going to protest are staying away,” said Andrew Friedson, the CU-Denver professor who is one of the paper’s co-authors. “The overall effect for the entire city is more social distancing because people are avoiding the protests.”

So those massive gatherings you saw were offset by people who were probably going to stay home anyway, get it?

Check back next week to see if there isn’t yet another study suggesting the protests slowed the spread of coronavirus.


Related:

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement