A deep dive into the legality of the YouTube ‘prankster’ shooting—and why his...
Merrick Garland channels SNL's sleazy lawyer Nathan Thurm in his 60 Minutes appearance...
What? 41% of the French population favor limiting people to FOUR flights for...
Ari Drennen from Media Matters gets SCHOOLED after saying homeschooling should be illegal
Goodest boi bites owner. X responds as it should
That's gonna be a big fat NO: David Frum ROASTED after suggesting Congress...
'Doing about the best job possible': Kurt Schlichter defends Speaker Kevin McCarthy
Former Speaker Newt Gingrich: 'Is Gaetz secretly an agent for the Democratic Party?'
Breaking: Former Boston Red Sox pitcher Tim Wakefield dies at 57
Here's a list of all the stories I couldn't write about this week...
‘Things white families do’: Woke K12 opposes positive activities, wants focus on ‘oppressi...
'Democrats failed': Sen. John Cornyn blames 'Sen. Schumer's failure of leadership'
Marine Corps relaxes attire rules amid camouflage uniform shortage
'You're a FOOL': Megyn Kelly VICIOUSLY claps back at Mediaite for trying to...
Like father like daughter --> Liz Cheney pushing to fund more war in...

New York Times' 1619 Project creator says 'It would be an honor' to call the George Floyd riots the 1619 riots

The New York Post had a piece Saturday suggesting that the riots that exploded after the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minneapolis be called the “1619 riots.” Charles Kesler writes:

The justified indignation over George Floyd’s killing has led to calls for policing reform and for the country to do better at fulfilling its principles. But the reaction hasn’t stopped with those worthy and noble objectives. It has surged well beyond to an ­attack on the principles themselves, which allegedly give rise to “systemic racism.”

So who else can they get at? Well, an easier target is one particular set of privileged, white males: the American Founders. The system at the root of systemic racism, the radicals argue, is the American one, beginning with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. America, they claim, was born a racist nation and remains one today.

The most prominent proponent of the argument is The New York Times’s 1619 Project, named after the year the first black slaves arrived in America. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Times reporter who leads the project, has argued that “the year 1619 is as important to the American story as 1776.”

Her editor, Jake Silverstein, has backed her to the hilt. Black slavery “is sometimes referred to as the country’s original sin,” he asserted, “but it is more than that: It is the country’s very origin. Out of slavery — and the anti-black racism it required — grew nearly everything that has truly made America exceptional,” especially “its astonishing penchant for violence” and “its endemic racial fears and hatreds.”

In other words, 1619 is not “as important” as 1776; it is far more important and more revealing.

To which Nikole Hannah-Jones replied she’d be honored if she had some influence on the naming of the riots:

As Sally Kohn pointed out, Hannah-Jones notes that “it’s only property” — maybe just a black-owned small business here or there that was looted and burned down during the 1619 riots, or a pharmacy on which blacks depended to fill their prescriptions.

The 1619 Project: Coming to your school soon if it’s not part of the curriculum already.



Trending on Twitchy Videos