WH Drops a BRUTAL Reality MOAB After CNN Defends Their 'Fair and Accurate...
It's 'Orangeland' Now: President Trump Announces PERMANENT Greenland Security Deal
Napoleonic Syndrome: Stepstool Abdul Challenges Vance to a Beard Inspection and Weightlift...
DeSantis Is Enforcing the Law, but Rep. Salazar Is Selling Amnesty With a...
Here's Another Gem of an Illegal Biden Let Into the U.S. (Bill Melugin...
Fairfax County Atty.'s Pledge to Prosecute Those Who Threaten Public Safety Is a...
Gavin Newsom Helpfully Just Made It More Clear Than Ever That He's Insane...
Joe Scarborough Blew His Big Interview With Abdul El-Sayed
You KNOW It's Getting Bad for El-Sayed When Even Morning Joe Is Calling...
NRSC Video Montage ENDS Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Twitch...
People Are LOVING Laura Ingraham Taking Abdul El-Sayed APART for Ignorant Comment on...
Oh, HONEY: Lefty Phone Banker Roasted for Whining That Voters Keep Asking Her...
'Now We Know Why'! Scott Jennings Flashes Back to What Happened on CNN...
This Is RICH: Chuck Schumer’s PAC Drops Some SERIOUS Coin on Supposed Anti-Big-Money...
Trump's Second Term Will Never Survive the Latest Cringe-Worthy Celebrity 'Resistance' Vid...
Premium

New York Times' 1619 Project creator says 'It would be an honor' to call the George Floyd riots the 1619 riots

The New York Post had a piece Saturday suggesting that the riots that exploded after the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minneapolis be called the “1619 riots.” Charles Kesler writes:

The justified indignation over George Floyd’s killing has led to calls for policing reform and for the country to do better at fulfilling its principles. But the reaction hasn’t stopped with those worthy and noble objectives. It has surged well beyond to an ­attack on the principles themselves, which allegedly give rise to “systemic racism.”

So who else can they get at? Well, an easier target is one particular set of privileged, white males: the American Founders. The system at the root of systemic racism, the radicals argue, is the American one, beginning with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. America, they claim, was born a racist nation and remains one today.

The most prominent proponent of the argument is The New York Times’s 1619 Project, named after the year the first black slaves arrived in America. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Times reporter who leads the project, has argued that “the year 1619 is as important to the American story as 1776.”

Her editor, Jake Silverstein, has backed her to the hilt. Black slavery “is sometimes referred to as the country’s original sin,” he asserted, “but it is more than that: It is the country’s very origin. Out of slavery — and the anti-black racism it required — grew nearly everything that has truly made America exceptional,” especially “its astonishing penchant for violence” and “its endemic racial fears and hatreds.”

In other words, 1619 is not “as important” as 1776; it is far more important and more revealing.

To which Nikole Hannah-Jones replied she’d be honored if she had some influence on the naming of the riots:

As Sally Kohn pointed out, Hannah-Jones notes that “it’s only property” — maybe just a black-owned small business here or there that was looted and burned down during the 1619 riots, or a pharmacy on which blacks depended to fill their prescriptions.

The 1619 Project: Coming to your school soon if it’s not part of the curriculum already.


Related:

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement