Culture Clubbed: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Says Trump’s Second Election Already Crushed...
'I'm With Iran': John Pavlovitz and the Left's Long Tradition of Siding With...
Did Iran Cave or Was This TACO Tuesday? CNN's Erin Burnett Apparently Disappointed
From Tampon Tim to Hypocrite-in-Chief: Walz's Trump Attack Backfires Spectacularly
Zohran Mamdani’s Office Says New York’s History Is One of Colonization and Racial...
Society Thrives on Marriage and Birth Celebrations— Not Birthday Extravaganzas for the Sin...
Rep. María Salazar Hopes Her Dignity Act Eventually Leads to a Path to...
As Crime Explodes, Minneapolis Leaders Go Full Sodom: Legal Bathhouses Incoming
Politico Wants You to Meet Harmeet Dhillon, the Woman Who Thinks Civil Rights...
AP: Iran's Supreme National Security Council Has Accepted a Two-Week Ceasefire
Video Shows Illegal Wanted for Murder Attempting to Run Down ICE Agents, Getting...
Rubio Tuesday
James Woods Calls Out Jennifer Newsom for Telling Prisoners Their Crimes Were Probably...
Scum of the Earth Stick Together: Cheating Ruben Gallego Defends Eric Swalwell Amid...
Iranian TV: Iranians Locking Arms to Form Human Shields Around Power Plants
Premium

New York Times' 1619 Project creator says 'It would be an honor' to call the George Floyd riots the 1619 riots

The New York Post had a piece Saturday suggesting that the riots that exploded after the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minneapolis be called the “1619 riots.” Charles Kesler writes:

The justified indignation over George Floyd’s killing has led to calls for policing reform and for the country to do better at fulfilling its principles. But the reaction hasn’t stopped with those worthy and noble objectives. It has surged well beyond to an ­attack on the principles themselves, which allegedly give rise to “systemic racism.”

So who else can they get at? Well, an easier target is one particular set of privileged, white males: the American Founders. The system at the root of systemic racism, the radicals argue, is the American one, beginning with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. America, they claim, was born a racist nation and remains one today.

The most prominent proponent of the argument is The New York Times’s 1619 Project, named after the year the first black slaves arrived in America. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Times reporter who leads the project, has argued that “the year 1619 is as important to the American story as 1776.”

Her editor, Jake Silverstein, has backed her to the hilt. Black slavery “is sometimes referred to as the country’s original sin,” he asserted, “but it is more than that: It is the country’s very origin. Out of slavery — and the anti-black racism it required — grew nearly everything that has truly made America exceptional,” especially “its astonishing penchant for violence” and “its endemic racial fears and hatreds.”

In other words, 1619 is not “as important” as 1776; it is far more important and more revealing.

To which Nikole Hannah-Jones replied she’d be honored if she had some influence on the naming of the riots:

As Sally Kohn pointed out, Hannah-Jones notes that “it’s only property” — maybe just a black-owned small business here or there that was looted and burned down during the 1619 riots, or a pharmacy on which blacks depended to fill their prescriptions.

The 1619 Project: Coming to your school soon if it’s not part of the curriculum already.


Related:

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement