We Have Lost Too Many Legends — but a First-Of-Its-Kind Pill Just Gave...
El-Sayed's Latest Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Streamer in California' Is Failing...
American Heroes of 9/11: Rick Rescorla
Appeals Court Tosses Rep. LaMonica McIver's Claim of Legislative Immunity
Here Are Details About the Arrested 'Father' This NM Dem Didn't Mention While...
Taylor Lorenz: Queen of Cancel Culture & Leopards Eating Faces Party Founder Discovers...
Lunatic District Attorney Vows to 'Blow Up' White House Ballroom
Dana Loesch’s Bold Fix: Stuff Near-80 Icons in Giant Koozies Before We Lose...
Chris Murphy Finally Remembers the State He's Supposed to Represent (Just Not the...
Mike Rogers Nukes Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From yet ANOTHER Issue
Can't Help but Notice What Abdul El-Sayed Does NOT Do When Responding to...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Tells Wolf Blitzer She's Tired of People Asking Her...
Sean Parnell Makes a Pledge to Gold Star Families on the Fifth Anniversary...
Hillary Clinton Welcomes Dem 'Experiment' to See If Unhinged Socialists Can Help Win...
DEM-Olition Man: Philly DA Larry Krasner Wants to Blow Up the White House...

Professors, of course: Significant speech control is an inevitable component of a 'mature and flourishing internet'

It’s frankly not surprising that writers for The Atlantic are anxious to put some distance between a new piece claiming that in the debate over freedom on the internet, “China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong.”

Advertisement

Of course, the piece is written by two academics, Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School professor, and Andrew Keane Woods, professor of law at the University of Arizona College of Law. They write:

But the “extraordinary” measures we are seeing are not all that extraordinary. Powerful forces were pushing toward greater censorship and surveillance of digital networks long before the coronavirus jumped out of the wet markets in Wuhan, China, and they will continue to do so once the crisis passes. The practices that American tech platforms have undertaken during the pandemic represent not a break from prior developments, but an acceleration of them.

In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.

Advertisement

Crazy to think that college professors would believe the communist Chinese are doing things right. We will give them credit for still believing the coronavirus originated in the wet markets (at least they’re not buying the Chinese story that the U.S. military infected them), but one of our alarm bells is their second wake-up call”: “The second wake-up call was Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.” Yeah, Facebook ads?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement