Lancet Study Says Elon Musk Will Have Killed 14 Million People by 2030
Woman Who Drowned Her Baby and Blamed COVID Found Not Guilty; Ron DeSantis...
Member of Trans Death Cult the Zizians Charged in Execution-Style Murders of Her...
John Fetterman Asks Why He’s the Only Dem Senator to Denounce ’Self-Identified Communists’
Evita Duffy Claps Back at Daily Beast’s Obsession: ‘I Don’t Find Fulfillment From...
Say 'Free Palestine' or Else: Free Palestine Thug Corners Cowering Scott Wiener at...
‘Temporary’ Insanity: Attorney on MS NOW Says Haitian Refugees Should Stay Because Equity...
Convicted Traitor Bradley Manning Trades Leaking Secrets for Dropping Beats at DSA Commie...
James Carville: Done Sharing a Tent With Jew-Haters … Except an Actual Nazi-Tattooed...
Jemele Hill: Is Boomer Esiason Saying Caitlin Clark Deserves 'Special Treatment' for Being...
Clown Ro Khanna Accuses Man With Chinese Wife of Being Racist Against the...
FIFA to Allow Rainbow Flags at Seattle’s ‘Pride Match’ Between Iran and Egypt...
Team Newsom Tried and Failed to Convince SCOTUS There's a Grocery Store Exception...
Deleted Tweet Alert: Phoenix Mercury Mocks Caitlin Clark After Its Players Maul and...
Krystal Ball Can’t Believe Antifa Terrorist Faces Jail ‘For Having Leftist Reading Materia...

Professors, of course: Significant speech control is an inevitable component of a 'mature and flourishing internet'

It’s frankly not surprising that writers for The Atlantic are anxious to put some distance between a new piece claiming that in the debate over freedom on the internet, “China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong.”

Advertisement

Of course, the piece is written by two academics, Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School professor, and Andrew Keane Woods, professor of law at the University of Arizona College of Law. They write:

But the “extraordinary” measures we are seeing are not all that extraordinary. Powerful forces were pushing toward greater censorship and surveillance of digital networks long before the coronavirus jumped out of the wet markets in Wuhan, China, and they will continue to do so once the crisis passes. The practices that American tech platforms have undertaken during the pandemic represent not a break from prior developments, but an acceleration of them.

In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.

Advertisement

Crazy to think that college professors would believe the communist Chinese are doing things right. We will give them credit for still believing the coronavirus originated in the wet markets (at least they’re not buying the Chinese story that the U.S. military infected them), but one of our alarm bells is their second wake-up call”: “The second wake-up call was Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.” Yeah, Facebook ads?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement