The Bulwark: Volunteers Delivering Babies at Home for Mothers Afraid of Going to...
Jeffrey Epstein Survivors to Attend SOTU as Guests of Democrats
Globe and Mail: 'Out of Nowhere,' Canada Became Poorer Than Alabama
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Requires Two Forms of ID to Become an Emergency Snow...
Talked Smack About America, Flipped the 'L' at Trump — Hunter Hess Finishes...
Attorney Attacks ICE Agents During Detention Operation, Finds Out
MLB Hall of Famer Bill Mazeroski Who Hit the Greatest Home Run In...
Sixth-Grade Special Needs Student Left Behind at Anti-ICE School Walkout
Minnesota Somali Women Demand Reparations for ICE 'Trauma'
Seeking a Better Life... at America's Expense: Expired Student Visa Scammer Bilks Seniors...
Texas Dems Looking Into 8-Month 'Coverup' of ICE Agent Killing a Citizen
MS NOW Host Says NOTHING As Chuck Schumer Claims Trump's Criticism of SCOTUS...
Remember Dems Denying Coordination Between the WH and DOJ on the Mar-a-Lago Raid?...
Another 'Outrageous ICE Abuse' Story from The Guardian—Headline Ignores Husband's Expired...
Poor Canada: Betting Their Entire Country's Worth on Beating the 'Hated' USA. Spoiler:...

Professors, of course: Significant speech control is an inevitable component of a 'mature and flourishing internet'

It’s frankly not surprising that writers for The Atlantic are anxious to put some distance between a new piece claiming that in the debate over freedom on the internet, “China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong.”

Advertisement

Of course, the piece is written by two academics, Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School professor, and Andrew Keane Woods, professor of law at the University of Arizona College of Law. They write:

But the “extraordinary” measures we are seeing are not all that extraordinary. Powerful forces were pushing toward greater censorship and surveillance of digital networks long before the coronavirus jumped out of the wet markets in Wuhan, China, and they will continue to do so once the crisis passes. The practices that American tech platforms have undertaken during the pandemic represent not a break from prior developments, but an acceleration of them.

In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.

Advertisement

Crazy to think that college professors would believe the communist Chinese are doing things right. We will give them credit for still believing the coronavirus originated in the wet markets (at least they’re not buying the Chinese story that the U.S. military infected them), but one of our alarm bells is their second wake-up call”: “The second wake-up call was Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.” Yeah, Facebook ads?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement