The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman is trending Saturday afternoon after President Trump called her and other journalists out, saying she and all the others should give back the Pulitizer Prizes they won for their reporting on the Russian collusion scandal that wasn’t.
President Trump calls on New York Times WH correspondent Maggie Haberman to give back her Pulitzer Prize awarded for Russia reporting during coronavirus task force briefing.
— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) April 18, 2020
Here’s video:
President Trump calls @maggieNYT a "terrible, dishonest reporter" for a story about how Mark Meadows cried. He also says she should give back her Pulitzer Prize for the Russia investigation.
"She is fake, a lot of people are fake." pic.twitter.com/dMS0ZN3fD5
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) April 18, 2020
Facts show @nytimes @maggieNYT got the story 100% wrong.
It shows the Pulitzer means nothing. Like the Nobel Peace Award.
They are the lefties participation trophies ?
— its Patty (@PattyQuinten) April 18, 2020
As she should…she’s a fraud. Thank you President @realDonaldTrump for fighting back.
— Molly Martinez – Pray for Rush (@MollyDiamond28) April 18, 2020
Tough but fair
— ed (@eleventy17) April 18, 2020
Pulitzer for Russian propaganda. She should be so proud.
— Dillon98 (@Dillon982) April 18, 2020
It shows you how worthless a Pulitzer is these days
— Buffalo Bill (@Buffalo_Bill33) April 18, 2020
Where's the lie?
— Krian Brassenstein (@KBrassenstein) April 18, 2020
I mean, he's not wrong.
— Common Sense (@commonsense8403) April 18, 2020
The entire NYT and WAPO groups who reported during that time should return their prizes.
— fugitivemama in lockdown (@fugitivemama) April 18, 2020
He's not wrong.
— Lead and Gold (@leadandgold_cdh) April 18, 2020
Yes good. @maggieNYT is using this crisis to push her same corrupt agenda for which she won that award. It’s relevant. @maggieNYT does not want a recovery. This will boomerang on her and all those using this to advance a political agenda.
— De Le Mancha (@delemancha) April 18, 2020
Not wrong. Journalism doesn’t exist anymore, no point in rewarding anyone for it.
— Whiskey Exotic, Esq. ??? (@LibertyRalston) April 18, 2020
And she should. It is worthless. No reporting was done…..all fake. pic.twitter.com/llSszpaZbB
— Tracy LaMiere (@LamiereT) April 18, 2020
He's right. Haberman had a journalistic responsibility to investigate what the FBI was doing, not just spout Comey talking points.
— Pattypan (@Pattypan) April 18, 2020
Delicious!
— Robyn ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@robdetf) April 18, 2020
— Nathaniel H. Chapman (@nresp1) April 18, 2020
@maggieNYT her Pulitzer is as relevant as @BarackObama Peace prize.
— U R B A N ? C O W B O Y (@mutinypictures) April 18, 2020
This needs to happen. @maggieNYT give it back. Your life work is a lie. Fake news isn’t brave. It cheapens real journalism.
— PleaseRethinkYourLife?? (@reallukiehere) April 18, 2020
Why should she have a Pulitzer for promoting a false story??
— Stephanie Easland (@sdeasland1) April 18, 2020
Every reporter who lied to us 24/7 for three years about a Russian conspiracy should apologize profusely, redact, return now meaningless awards, and most importantly not expect us to believe a word they publish going forward ESPECIALLY as regards a global health & economic crisis
— May Thewords (@MayThewords) April 18, 2020
CLASSIC @realDonaldTrump ??
— Russ D (@realRussD) April 18, 2020
Related:
Hey guys, Tater has a sad — After months of cheerleading the worst aspects of the pandemic Brian Stelter has a breakdownhttps://t.co/NZxosBq9at
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 18, 2020
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.