Monday Morning Meme Madness
Neera Tanden Fooled by AI Video Featuring Viking in Bathtub on Wheels Escaping...
Don Lemon Better Pray He Didn’t Violate Members’ Civil Rights While Disrupting Church...
Don Lemon Leads ICE Protestors to Church - Just NOT How You Think
Sen. Rick Scott Lists 4 Goals 'That Should Be Our Focus to Grow...
DAMN, SON! Eric Swalwell Threatens ICE Agents and Mike Davis Tells Him to...
Hannah Gadsby's Awesome Idea to 'Subvert The Male Gaze'
WOW: Jay Jones In SUCH a Rush to Rob Millions of Virginians of...
Jake Tapper GRILLS Mayor Jacob Frey (Just Kidding; He Let Frey Filibuster for...
Not TODAY, Margaret! Kristi Noem ENDS Margaret Brennan in HEATED Debate Over Arrested...
Virginia Speaker (and Former Crack Dealer) Gets High on His Own Supply Accusing...
Sorry, WHAT? Scott Jennings Takes Holier-Than-Thou Lefty Claiming Repubs Have No Moral Com...
Karoline Leavitt Goes Straight FIRE Warning CBS Not to FAFO With Trump Interview...
Well Well Well, This Certainly Doesn't Help the Fraud-Happy Somalis
Aaron Rupar’s Snotty Question About What Trump Could do to Make the Country...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement