SCOTUS Takes on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Crackdown: A Battle Over the 14th Amendment...
Netflix to Buy Warner Brothers. Will the Snyderverse Make a Return?
Joe Biden Emerges From Dems' Forced Retirement to Remind Us We Are the...
Rising to the Caucasian: Jake Tapper’s ‘White’ Lie Is Beyond the Pale but...
Harmeet Dhillon Exposes 260K Dead + Thousands of Illegals on Voter Rolls –...
It's ALL Non-Standard! Doctors Admit Performing Horrific 'Non-Standard' Gender Surgeries o...
The MN Welfare Fraud Scheme Just Got REALLY Uncomfortable for Tim Walz and...
Out of the Mouths of Babes: Teen Girls Torch Democrat Governor for Betraying...
If Anyone Is 'Garbage,' It Is Elected Democrats and Their Manufactured, Selective Outrage
President Trump’s Soccer Take Triggers National Emergency-Level Meltdown
'What Happened Should Worry Everyone': Adam Schiff Mortgage Fraud Case Witness Shares EYE-...
Elissa Slotkin's 'Seditious Six' Narrative Crumbles on 'Morning Joe'
'MASSIVE Fraud Uncovered' --> New Obamacare Data Shares DAMNING Look Into Shady Subsidy...
Chris Murphy Trips Over a Horde of Rabid Dems in Rush to Blame...
Ya' LOVE to See It: Turns Out Both Eric Swalwell and Katie Porter...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos