Backfire: Family Demands Answers in Police Shooting, Gets Them in Bodycam Footage
Shuttering Chicago Walgreens Says It Lost $1 Million, Mostly Due to Theft
Just When You Thought California Couldn't Get Worse: Arcadia Mayor Busted as Chinese...
Chelsea Handler’s 'Brutal' Draft Roast Implodes: Ma’am, Men Have Been Registering at 18...
White TN State Rep Mobbed by Racists in Scene Reminiscent of Little Rock...
The Bulwark's Sam Stein Spins His Latest Fiction: Turns Duffy's Weekend Drives Into...
NYT’s Nicholas Kristof Spreads the Israeli Rape Dogs Smear
Nonprofit Files Lawsuit to Stop Repainting of the 'Solemn and Hallowed' Reflecting Pool
Safeguards? Nah. Ohio Flipped the Off Switch on Medicaid Verification and Let the...
Bernie Wonders Why Everything Sucks After Tripling Premiums, Printing Money, and Importing...
Hakeem Jeffries Gets Boxed in: He Might Never Win Again
AOC Says States Like TN Want to 'Wipe Out Every Black Representative' While...
Bill Melugin Schools Democrats: No, Biden Did Fly in Hundreds of Thousands of...
Hakeem Jeffries Makes It Clear His 'Trump Threatens Our Norms and Institutions' BS...
The Left's Meltdown Over the Lincoln Memorial Pool Is a Perfect Reflection ......

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement