Sen. Corey Booker Observes Brian Sicknick Day in New Jersey, Who Gave His...
LBC: Three Migrants Found Dead on Boat in the English Channel; All Women,...
'Now Is the Time to Do What You're Told': MAZE Compiles COVID Fear-Mongering...
Trump Invites Viral Teen Lifeguard Hero to the White House — and Usual...
Madison Is Paying Overtime to Keep CRAZ, the Corey Ruiz Autonomous Zone, Blocked...
Bernie Sanders Asks How ‘Poor’ Mark Zuckerberg Will Survive If CA Passes Wealth...
Maine Dems Swap Nazi Senate Candidate for Guy Who Fathered Kids With His...
Haitian Migrant Reminds Us That Haitians Built America
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Posts Cringe-Inducing Anti-ICE Dad Joke
Clay Travis Reminds America: While Fauci Deflects, DeSantis Faced the Tyranny—and Saved Us
Idol Foments: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Defiantly Refuses to Accept Fauci’s a Fraud,...
Spanish Prime Minister Is Fully Committed to 'Restoring Normalcy' During Invasion of Moroc...
Faux Photo: WGN Airs Fake Pic of 49ers Coach in Hospital Bed Flanked...
While Spain Gets Invaded, Here Are Reminders About What Team Biden Allowed and...
Texas Court Swears in Witness 'in the Name of Allah,' Igniting Fury Over...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement