Tucker Carlson Will Be 'Tormented for a Long Time' for Playing a Part...
Talking Skit: Jake Tapper Puts in Scripted Appearance on Colbert to Promote WHCD...
Tim Walz: Democrats Would Win the ‘Battle of Ideas’ Against Republicans If Their...
Obama Bro Says Jewish Insider ‘Intentionally Misinterpreted’ Chris Murphy’s Sarcastic Twee...
Mouth-Breather Makes BIG DEAL About How SORE-EE He Is About Voting for Trump...
Democrats Dropping Like Flies: Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick Quits to Dodge Expulsion Over Ethi...
Savanah Hernandez Calls CREEP Brian Shapiro OUT for Harassing Her in DMs and...
Ghost of Kyiv 2.0: Kinzinger Gets Duped by Iran — Ships Not 'Blowing...
Chuck Schumer Using Atlantic's Hit Piece to Attack Kash Patel Shows There's Something...
The Growth of Homeschooling in America
Chris Murphy Might've Just Ended His Career As Trump Names Traitors
HUME-ILIATED: Brit Hume Unloads on VA Dems and Their 'Egregious Gerrymander' Push As...
Maury Povich's Reaction to Joy Reid Claiming Democrats Play by the Rules Is...
DESPICABLE Fairfax Teachers Prove They'll Do ANYTHING to Con Virginians Into Voting Yes...
The Atlantic Hopes No One Noticed the BIG CHANGE They Made to Their...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos