Jimmy Kimmel's Oscars' Swipe at 'Countries Whose Leaders Don't Support Free Speech' Was,...
Youth Travel Sports Have Become a Family-Destroying Trap – Thank God Someone Finally...
BREAKING: Bluesky's New Pitch: Come Over to Bluesky, You Will Be Glad to...
Maine Kampf: Platner Walks Back Apology for 'Nazi Skull' Tattoo, Calls It Eminently...
CNN's New Token Anti-Trump Republican: Marjorie Taylor Greene, Fresh Off Hating on the...
New York Times Heartbroken: Latin America Refuses to Keep Propping Up Castro's Eternal...
Jonathan Turley Rants Against the Shutdown
Fox News: Accused Synagogue Attacker Related to Hezbollah Commander
Seth Dillon DROPS Iranian-Sympathizing Nutball Tucker Carlson for Claiming He Tried Bribin...
LH Grey Goes OFF on Toads Who Doxxed Cynical Publius in Maybe the...
Who Wants to Tell Her? Dem Rep Shakes Her Fist at Trump REFUSING...
WATCH Cory Booker's Face As Jake Tapper Pushes Back on His Lie About...
So ... What's Going on Between Chris Murphy and Iran?
Law Professor Completely NUKING AOC and Her 'I'm Devastated' Post About MI Synagogue...
TX Democrat Wack-Job FAFOs Hard After Peddling Insane 'Married Friend' Sob Story to...

The folks at The Bulwark think 'the three horsemen' could be 'force multipliers' in prying Trump out of office

Just to make it clear upfront: Bill Kristol didn’t write the piece; it was Jonathan Last who came up with the metaphor of — get this — Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, and Mark Sanford being the “three horsemen coming for Trump.”

Advertisement

For what it’s worth, on Monday night, President Trump dismissed the three as “a total joke.” He doesn’t sound concerned to us, but maybe he’s just good at hiding his fear.

In any case, here’s Bill Kristol pointing to Last’s piece in The Bulwark.

And here’s the thinking of where each horseman of the apocalypse stands in providing leverage against Trump:

Which is where Mark Sanford comes in. He’s the obvious—and predictable—reaction to Trump’s transformation of the party’s fiscal orthodoxies.

The same can be said—along different vectors—about Weld and Walsh.

Weld represents the kind of moderate, establishment Republicanism that has been on the outs in the party since John Anderson in 1980. The Rockefeller wing of the party was never very big. Outside of the Northeast it’s miniscule. But it exists. And most conservative presidents have tried to stroke it (as needed) rather than crap all over it.

As for Walsh, he’s the representative of Trump’s unfulfilled populist promises: There is no wall. What we’re getting is 174 miles of fence and it’s going to be paid for by abusing the Constitution to take money that was supposed to keep schools for the children of U.S. soldiers safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

But which one is going to conserve conservatism the best? Which one is Molly Jong-Fast going to vote for?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement