Brian Stelter Has a Pic From the Packed House at Oliver Darcy's 'Information...
Mehdi Hasan Wants Apologies From Those Who Insisted War Would Stop If Hamas...
FAIL: James Talarico Tries to Convince a Reporter He No Longer Believes All...
Joe Scarborough: White House Will Hate the Success of Tennis Star From S**thole...
Those CREEPY HANDS! Gavin Newsom Scolds JD Vance While Bragging About Healthcare for...
‘Let’s Roll’: Flight 93 Hero Todd Beamer’s Father Endorses Mike Rogers — ‘Vote...
Ted Cruz Cites CNN's Reporting on James Talarico (Kaitlan Collins Runs Cover for...
American Heroes of 9/11: Officer John W. Perry
The Party of Empathy Wishes JK Rowling Had Been Offed by Her Ex-Husband
'Morally Obtuse Idiots': Matt Walsh UNLOADS on the Lindsay Clancy Jurors the Way...
James Talarico’s Pastor: People in This Church Wish Trump’s Assassin ‘Had Been More...
Here's the Self-Refuting Media Headline of the Day That Proves 'No Such Thing...
It's Time to Talk About 'Lanterns,' the Left's Latest Effort to Destroy Something...
LA County Takes $5 Million Meant for Fire Victims and Hands It to...
South Park Spent Decades Roasting Everyone. Now It’s Just ‘Orange Man Bad’

'Exactly what anyone with a clue thought': New York Times obtains President Trump's tax return figures

Is was just over two years ago that Rachel Maddow sent The Resistance hyperventilating into paper bags with the news that she had in her possession Donald Trump’s tax returns. Remember this?

Advertisement

You might also remember that although her ratings were through the roof, the revealing of the 2005 tax return was a giant dud: it turned out that Trump paid about $38 million in federal tax in 2005, leaving The New York Times to try to keep the excitement going with this hot take:

Yeah? Yawn.

Now The New York Times is trying to recapture that magic by revealing that it has 10 years’ worth of Trump’s federal income tax returns; well, figures from the tax returns at least.

Advertisement

We kind of miss all the pundits talking about Russian collusion 24/7 — at least that was mildly interesting.

Good point.

Advertisement

Second look at Bill Weld?


Related:

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos