There are so many hot takes on the Mueller report today from the Democrat/media establishment and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes thinks he knows why people think there’s evidence of criminal activity by the president in the Mueller report.
You see, President Trump was so personally offended by the investigation he undertook outright criminal actions to shut down the investigation, despite being innocent in the first place. That’s one hot take: the Mueller investigation itself drove Trump to criminal activity.
Two theories here, and there are arguments for each, I think
1) The president is so emotionally incontinent and was so personally offended by the investigation that he undertook all kinds of desperate, possibility outright criminal actions to shut it down despite being innocent.— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) April 18, 2019
But wait for it: here’s Theory No. 2:
or/but/and
2) The President was determined to cover up his actions because he had something to hide and he was somewhat successful in doing so and we don't really know definitively what that was.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) April 18, 2019
“We don’t really know definitively what that was” — but we dedicated our entire programming block for two years to speculate on what it could be.
Would you be offended if the BHO admin spied on you, the Dir of the FBI set you up and the MSM assisted enthusiastically with their efforts, knowing that their charges of collusion were baseless? https://t.co/RaSaHNqcVm
— BayAreaFrau (@bayareahausfrau) April 18, 2019
All of that, while knowing that it was started by the actions of your political opponent and her commission of an unverified, salacious report of opposition research.
I'd be fucking pissed off, out of my mind, @ChrisHayes
— BayAreaFrau (@bayareahausfrau) April 18, 2019
‘Personally offended by the investigation’…someone would be offended by being called a traitor to his Country?
Follow up, Chris Hayes is a pedophile. I don’t have any proof, but we will launch a 2 year round the clock investigation to prove it. Don’t be offended Chris!
— Rusty Shackleford (@dalesdeadbugtx) April 18, 2019
How about: "The president was innocent and could not believe all these people were trying to undermine him in this unprecedented way and had a hard time wrapping his arms around it but finally did, fought back and prevailed." What goes against that scenario?
— Brian McNicoll (@McNicollb) April 18, 2019
Or…. Knowing he wasn't guilty he was offended by the baseless accusations and actually wanted to govern instead of seeing this circus go on.
— Matt Burton (@Mburton1967) April 18, 2019
Maybe he was mad because he was he was being unjustly accused and investigated.
— j'accuse (@jaccuse16) April 18, 2019
Translation:
We know Trump didn't commit a crime, but we'd like to prosecute him for defending himself. Is that possible?
— Harold Christian (@Cchris12) April 18, 2019
Or he was so offended at the accusations knowing he did none of what he was accused of.
— David (@nilesinvt63) April 18, 2019
I'll take choice 3) There was no collusion and no obstruction
Thank you.#NoCollusionNoObstruction— Justin Shepherd (@JShepherdPT) April 18, 2019
I’ll solve it for you. 2 years, millions of dollars, countless subpoenas and testimonies all because Hillary lost an election. You’re welcome.
— Tim C (@TJC3030) April 18, 2019
3) You’re still butthurt that Hillary LOST!!
— Finckle_is_EINHORN (@JohnJohnrooney) April 18, 2019
Yeah. He didnt.
No one was fired.
The investigation was finished.
Quit putting hate before truth.
— Abolitionist (@ArtbyAWOHS) April 18, 2019
Theory does not equal fact. The Left wasted $30M and got what they deserved: the truth. Trump is vindicated – and people like you can't stand it.
— Truth is not subjective (@EdGontarz) April 18, 2019
Sorry, what was the President charged with?
— scott bieller (@sbieller) April 18, 2019
"Possibly outright criminal" is quite the oxymoron.
— CG's Geometry PitchBot (@cg_geometry) April 18, 2019
Don't you just love the left-wing talking points, "possibly, maybe, could be, if true…"? Never any facts though. Democrats and left-wing = dishonesty in motion.
— TopCat (@TheBigDawggg) April 18, 2019
No that’s not it. Go on….
— 3 Eyed Raven Bey ???? (@Charvettebey) April 18, 2019
Dude, y’all failed. Deal with the facts, not theories.
— Stephen Vasil (@Stephen_Vasil) April 18, 2019
Or maybe you've been wrong the ENTIRE time Chris. No need for theories. Admitting you were wrong is the 1st step, apologizing to those you've fed this BS for so long is the 2nd step. Sticking to your lies (aka theories) is not the way forward. But ignorance is bliss, right?
— TheDoctor1973 (@Indy500fanmd) April 18, 2019
Great journalisming, idiot.
— #LearnToHuntBounties (@BoberFett) April 18, 2019
— arthur (@archman_13) April 18, 2019
Not going to let this go are you? #winning
— get off my lawn (@P_Jarolimek) April 18, 2019
You cable news guys are really working hard to stupify everyone into incoherence. This is such dribble.
— Adri Elle (@WriterAdrielle) April 18, 2019
Can't stop tripping can you ? The MSM has been wrong for two years,why stop now.
— The Capitalist Panda Detective (@mchip50) April 18, 2019
Still with the lies Chris. Grow up. Still crying over the 2016 election is immature.
— grandmaRosie (@ingirltwin) April 18, 2019
Alex Jones wants his platform back.
You stole it a couple years ago when you began this debunked conspiracy theory.
Lay off the crack, sit back, sober up, and apologize. pic.twitter.com/a3YPUPqmX1
— Incommunicado (@In_communicado_) April 18, 2019
Hayes is going to have to come up with something to fill an hour later tonight, and the usual just won’t cut it tonight.
Related:
Honorary Obama bro says Dems are ignoring the ‘abundant collusion’ documented in the Mueller report https://t.co/8Vt34MUzjj
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 18, 2019
Join the conversation as a VIP Member