Joy Reid Couldn’t Wash It Off: Wajahat Ali Goes Shopping for a New...
Arlington County to Pay Families of Wage-Earners Detained by ICE Up to $2,000
Danbury, Connecticut City Council Votes to Allow Noncitizens to Be Hired As Police...
Caught on Tape: Nebraska 'Independent' Admits He Only Backed the Wall to Win...
Site Runs 'Hit Piece' on CA Assemblyman Who Sent $6 Million to His...
'Do Us a Favor and Stay Home': Families Confront Mamdani Over 9/11 Ceremony
CNN’s Anderson Cooper Examines the Need for Climate Justice ($$$) in Nepal
American Heroes of 9/11: Welles Crowther
Cartoon Cancer: Animated Gavin Newsom Says Having the DSA Under the Dems' ‘Big...
Prof Says ‘Someone Can Do the Funniest Thing’ to Nick Shirley Before the...
Hasan Piker: Telling NYC’s Mayor to Skip 9/11 Ceremonies Is ‘Racist Against Muslims’
MI Dem Senate Hopeful El-Sayed: 9/11 Was Bad, but We Need to Center...
People LOVE How Ted Cruz Patted Chris Murphy on the Head for His...
CODEPINK Files a Complaint Over Israeli Bath Salts. Yes, Really.
Pro-Palestine Gaza Native Shows X What a Pompous ASS Mehdi Hasan Really Is...

BOMBSHELL! NYT hints that some investigators think the Mueller report is more damaging than Barr says

OK, the only reason we put “bombshell” in the headline is that we were amused by this guy, who assures us it’s “a very big deal.”

Advertisement

It doesn’t sound like a bombshell — it sounds like a source leaking information they know the press and public wants to hear:

Members of the special counsel’s team “have told associates” there might be some bad news for President Trump in the Mueller report, and Attorney General William Barr isn’t correctly summarizing their findings.

It’s not a bombshell if it doesn’t catch you by surprise; the New York Times has a lot riding on the Mueller report damaging Trump. So maybe the “Mueller Time” and “tick-tock” crowd is getting a little serotonin boost Wednesday night, but it sounds like meh to us.

Advertisement

Um, hold up everybody. Remember how Resistance leaders like John Brennan were saying a week before the report’s release that there was absolute proof of Russian collusion? Do you really want to do this again and end up crying and vomiting like the women at Hillary Clinton’s victory party?

Wouldn’t, you know, Mueller himself have issued a formal statement if he thought Barr were mischaracterizing his findings?

Advertisement

You’d think the Times would at least consider waiting for the release of the redacted report before pushing any more of this speculation out there? They still have to sell papers, we guess.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement