Scott Jennings Recounts the Times He’s Confronted Dems and their ‘Dangerous Dance’ with...
Courthouse Video Released of Milwaukee Judge Who Allegedly Helped an Illegal Alien Evade...
CNN's Jake Tapper Tells CNN He Was Simply Too Polite to Report on...
Chicagoan Calls Mayor Brandon Johnson a Racist to His Face
This Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like
Flashback: President Biden Tells South Africa's President His Nelson Mandela Tale
YIKES: St. Louis Official Defends Her Failure to Activate City's Tornado Sirens (WATCH)
Trump Administration and Kristi Noem Uphold Moral Duty to Protect Jewish Students at...
OBSTRUCTION: Leftist Madison Police Brass Order Cops to Get PERMISSION Before Cooperating...
NYT: There's No Confiscation of Land in South Africa, Just a Measure to...
DUMBBELLS: Leftists (Including Taylor Lorenz) Continue Battle Against 'Fascist' Concept of...
NYT Remembers When President Trump Was the One Taking Land From Farmers
Jennifer Lawrence: Motherhood Changes You for the Better (and She's RIGHT)
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Says of Trump, 'He's a Monster, Period'
CONSEQUENCES: St. Louis Official Placed on PAID LEAVE for Not Activating Sirens During...

Science journal Nature finds assigning gender by the genitals one is born with 'has no foundation in science'

One solid comeback to progressives who say, for example, that science says a fetus isn’t a baby, is to ask how many genders there are, scientifically speaking.

Advertisement

Nature, the science journal, came out Monday in opposition to the Department of Health and Human Services proposal to establish a legal definition of whether someone is male or female based on the genitals they are born with, saying it has “no foundation in science.”

Nature writes:

The proposal — on which HHS officials have refused to comment — is a terrible idea that should be killed off. It has no foundation in science and would undo decades of progress on understanding sex — a classification based on internal and external bodily characteristics — and gender, a social construct related to biological differences but also rooted in culture, societal norms and individual behaviour. Worse, it would undermine efforts to reduce discrimination against transgender people and those who do not fall into the binary categories of male or female.

So gender is a social construct … that doesn’t sound like science.

Advertisement

But what about intersex people, smart guy?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos