Bloomberg: SCOTUS Has 'Given' Trump the Authority to Fire the Head of any...
See If You Can Spot the Difference Between 2021 and 2025 Jen Psaki's...
Pro-Hamas Protesters Cheer as UK Police Arrest Pro-Israel Protester
UK Police Arrest Jewish Protester for Placard Mocking Hezbollah
'You're Amazing People:' Check Out Some Highlights From President Trump's West Point Addre...
CBS News Reporter Triggered by Additional Credentialing Procedures at the Pentagon
WATCH: Seattle Lawyer Says It Wasn't Criminal for Her Illegal Alien Client to...
James Woods Presents the Most Unhinged Anti-Trump TikTok Rant We’ve Seen
SNC: This Week on Capitol Hill Celebrates One Big Beautiful Bill - 5-24-25
Atlantic Writer James Surowiecki Steps on ALL THE RAKES With His Hot Take...
OOF! Gavin Newsom Touts His Success With the PCH, Gets BURIED Under a...
Dear Media: It's the HYPOCRISY! Compare Carl Bernstein's Remarks on Trump to Coverage...
Hero: ‘Man of the People’ Joe Biden Flew Commercial Flight
'Stop or the Courts Will No Longer Be Obeyed:' Physics Geek Issues Warning...
Alex Thompson Says the White House Was 'Propping Up the Best Version' of...

Science journal Nature finds assigning gender by the genitals one is born with 'has no foundation in science'

One solid comeback to progressives who say, for example, that science says a fetus isn’t a baby, is to ask how many genders there are, scientifically speaking.

Advertisement

Nature, the science journal, came out Monday in opposition to the Department of Health and Human Services proposal to establish a legal definition of whether someone is male or female based on the genitals they are born with, saying it has “no foundation in science.”

Nature writes:

The proposal — on which HHS officials have refused to comment — is a terrible idea that should be killed off. It has no foundation in science and would undo decades of progress on understanding sex — a classification based on internal and external bodily characteristics — and gender, a social construct related to biological differences but also rooted in culture, societal norms and individual behaviour. Worse, it would undermine efforts to reduce discrimination against transgender people and those who do not fall into the binary categories of male or female.

So gender is a social construct … that doesn’t sound like science.

Advertisement

But what about intersex people, smart guy?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement